Detection and identification of bacterial contaminants from strawberry runner explants

被引:24
作者
Tanprasert P. [1 ]
Reed B.M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis
[2] USDA-ARS Natl. Clonal Germplasm R., Corvallis, OR 97333-2521
关键词
Contaminant detection; Endophytic bacteria; Fragaria; Micropropagation; Pseudomonas; Xanthomonas;
D O I
10.1007/s11627-997-0026-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Microbial contaminants were detected in surface-sterilized strawberry runner explants partially submerged in half-strength liquid Murashige and Skoog medium. From June to August, 1994, 45 of 70 strawberry genotypes were found to be contaminated, whereas from June to August, 1995, 53 of 72 contained contaminants. There were more bacterial than fungal contaminants. Bacterial contaminants from 22 strawberry genotypes were isolated, purified, and identified to genus by standard biochemical tests such as Gram's stain, motility, oxidase, and gelatinase, and carbon source utilization (Biolog Microplates, Biolog, Inc., Hayward, CA). Among the 30 isolates identified with the Biolog system, the majority were fluorescent pseudomonads including Pseudomonas fluorescens types A, F, and G. P. corrugate, P. tolaasii, P. paucimobilis, Xanthomonas campestris, Xanthomonas spp., and Enterobacter cloacae were also identified. Five Gram-negative and two Gram-positive contaminants could not be identified by the Biolog test. Biochemical tests were used to characterize the bacteria and to confirm Biolog test results. Bacteria identified in this study were soil, water, and plant related, indicating that efforts to reduce explant contaminant levels should be centered on the care of stock plants or the sterility of the watering system.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 226
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Bastiaens L., Endogenous bacteria in plants and their implications in tissue culture - A review, Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent., 48, pp. 1-11, (1983)
[2]  
Blake J., Mites and thrips as bacterial and fungal vectors between plant tissue cultures, Acta Hort., 225, pp. 163-166, (1988)
[3]  
Boxus P., Terzi J.M., Big losses due to bacterial contamination can be avoided in mass propagation scheme, Acta Hort., 212, pp. 91-93, (1987)
[4]  
Bradbury J.F., Identification of cultivable bacteria from plants and plant tissue cultures by use of simple classical methods, Acta Hort., 225, pp. 27-37, (1988)
[5]  
Buckley P.M., DeWilde T.N., Reed B.M., Characterization and identification of bacteria isolated from micropropagated mint plants, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol., 31 P, pp. 58-64, (1995)
[6]  
Cassells A.C., Problems in tissue culture: Culture contamination, Micropropagation Technology and Application, pp. 31-44, (1991)
[7]  
Debergh P.C., Vanderschaeghe A.M., Some symptoms indicating the presence of bacterial contaminants in plant tissue culture, Acta Hort., 255, pp. 77-81, (1988)
[8]  
Finer J.J., Saxton R.W., Norris B.L., Et al., Growth and disinfestation of 6 different bacteria in embryogenic suspension cultures of cotton, Plant Cell Rep., 10, pp. 380-383, (1991)
[9]  
Holmes B., Owen R.J., Evans A., Et al., Pseudomonas paucimobilis, a new species isolated from human clinical specimens, the hospital environment, and other sources, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 27, pp. 133-146, (1977)
[10]  
Jones J.B., Chase A.R., Harris G.K., Evaluation of the Biolog GN MicroPlate system for identification of some plant-pathogenic bacteria, Plant Dis., 77, pp. 553-558, (1993)