Inhibition of Aurora A in response to DNA damage

被引:0
作者
A Krystyniak
C Garcia-Echeverria
C Prigent
S Ferrari
机构
[1] Institute of Molecular Cancer Research,Department of Oncology
[2] University of Zurich,undefined
[3] Novartis Pharmaceuticals,undefined
[4] CNRS UMR6061,undefined
[5] Cell Cycle Group,undefined
[6] University of Rennes 1,undefined
来源
Oncogene | 2006年 / 25卷
关键词
AurA; CDK1; DNA damage; mitosis; phosphorylation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mitotic kinases are the ultimate target of pathways sensing genotoxic damage and impinging on the cell cycle machinery. Here, we provide evidence that Aurora A (AurA) was inhibited upon generation of double-strand breaks in DNA. We demonstrate that AurA was not downstream of CDK1 and that inhibition of AurA and CDK1 by DNA damage occurred independently. Using a cell line functionally deficient in Chk2, a selective Chk1 inhibitor and siRNA to Chk1, we show that DNA-damage signals were delivered to AurA through a Chk1-dependent pathway. With regard to the molecular mechanism of AurA inhibition, we found that the point mutation Ser342>Ala rendered AurA resistant to inhibition by DNA damage. By means of two distinct approaches we examined the impact of reconstitution of AurA activity in DNA-damaged cells: (i) transient expression of wild-type and Ser342>Ala mutant, but not kinase-dead, AurA led to bypass of the DNA damage block; (ii) direct transduction of highly active wt-AurA into G2 arrested cells precisely after induction of DNA damage resulted in mitotic entry. We show that the mechanism through which AurA allowed entry into mitosis was reactivation of CDK1, thus indicating that AurA plays a key role upstream of CDK1. A model depicting the possible role of AurA at the onset of mitosis and upon DNA damage is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 348
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inhibition of Aurora A in response to DNA damage
    Krystyniak, A
    Garcia-Echeverria, C
    Prigent, C
    Ferrari, S
    ONCOGENE, 2006, 25 (03) : 338 - 348
  • [2] Aurora kinases and DNA damage response
    Ma, Hoi Tang
    Poon, Randy Y. C.
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2020, 821
  • [3] Inhibition of Aurora-B kinase activity by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in response to DNA damage
    Monaco, L
    Kolthur-Seetharam, U
    Loury, R
    Ménissier-de Murcia, J
    de Murcia, G
    Sassone-Corsi, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (40) : 14244 - 14248
  • [4] Inhibition of Polo-like kinase 1 during the DNA damage response is mediated through loss of Aurora A recruitment by Bora
    Bruinsma, W.
    Aprelia, M.
    Garcia-Santisteban, I.
    Kool, J.
    Xu, Y. J.
    Medema, R. H.
    ONCOGENE, 2017, 36 (13) : 1840 - 1848
  • [5] Mitotic DNA damage targets the Aurora A/TPX2 complex
    Bhatia, Payal
    Menigatti, Mirco
    Brocard, Michele
    Morley, Simon
    Ferrari, Stefano
    CELL CYCLE, 2010, 9 (22) : 4592 - 4599
  • [6] Differential epithelium DNA damage response to ATM and DNA-PK pathway inhibition in human prostate tissue culture
    Zhang, Zhewei
    Yang, Zhiming
    Jaamaa, Sari
    Liu, Hester
    Pellakuru, Laxmi G.
    Iwata, Tsuyoshi
    af Hallstrom, Taija M.
    De Marzo, Angelo M.
    Laiho, Marikki
    CELL CYCLE, 2011, 10 (20) : 3545 - 3553
  • [7] Modification of the DNA Damage Response by Therapeutic CDK4/6 Inhibition
    Dean, Jeffry L.
    McClendon, A. Kathleen
    Knudsen, Erik S.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 287 (34) : 29075 - 29087
  • [8] DNA Damage Response and Autophagy: A Meaningful Partnership
    Eliopoulos, Aristides G.
    Havaki, Sophia
    Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2016, 7
  • [9] Cellular response to DNA damage
    Kao, Johnny
    Rosenstein, Barry S.
    Peters, Seila
    Milano, Michael T.
    Kron, Stephen J.
    CELL INJURY: MECHANISMS, RESPONSES, AND REPAIR, 2005, 1066 : 243 - 258
  • [10] DNA damage response A barrier or a path to tumor progression?
    Studzinski, George P.
    Wang, Xuening
    Danilenko, Michael
    CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2010, 9 (03) : 252 - 255