Validity and Reliability of Willingness-to-Pay EstimatesEvidence from Two Overlapping Discrete-Choice Experiments

被引:0
作者
Harry Telser
Karolin Becker
Peter Zweifel
机构
[1] Polynomics,Socioeconomic Institute
[2] University of Zurich,undefined
来源
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | 2008年 / 1卷
关键词
Marginal Utility; Socioeconomic Group; Insurance Contract; Price Attribute; Medical Innovation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Discrete-choice experiments (DCEs), while becoming increasingly popular, have rarely been tested for validity and reliability.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 298
页数:15
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Ryan M(2003)Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future reflections Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2 55-64
[2]  
Gerard K(2003)Estimating the monetary value of health care: lessons from environmental economics Health Econ 12 3-16
[3]  
Hanley N(1997)Consumer health plan choice Annu Rev Public Health 18 507-28
[4]  
Ryan M(2004)A comparison of stated preference methods for estimating monetary values Health Econ 13 291-6
[5]  
Wright R(2001)Analysing public preferences for cancer screening programmes Health Econ 10 617-34
[6]  
Scanlon DP(2000)Sensitivity of willingness to pay estimates to the level of attributes in discrete choice experiments Scott J Polit Econ 47 504-24
[7]  
Chernew ME(2000)Applying conjoint analysis in economic evaluations: an application to menorrhagia Appl Econ 32 823-33
[8]  
Lave JR(1998)Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care Health Econ 7 373-8
[9]  
Ryan M(1997)Using conjoint analysis to assess women’s preferences for miscarriage management Health Econ 6 261-73
[10]  
Gyrd-Hansen D(1999)Patients, doctors and contracts: an application of principal-agent theory to the doctor-patient relationship Scott J Polit Econ 46 111-34