Random Monte Carlo simulation analysis and risk assessment for ammonia concentrations in wastewater effluent disposal

被引:0
|
作者
Ivan Jose Carrasco
Shoou-Yuh Chang
机构
[1] North Carolina A&T State University,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
关键词
Monte Carlo simulation; Ammonia concentration; Water quality model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
High concentrations of ammonia in a river can cause fish kills and harms to other aquatic organisms. A simple water quality model is needed to predict the probability of ammonia concentration violations as compared to the US Environmental Protection Agency’s ammonia criteria. A spreadsheet with Random Monte Carlo (RMC) simulations to model ammonia concentrations at the mixing point (between a river and the effluent of a wastewater treatment plant) was developed with the use of Microsoft Excel and Crystal Ball add-in software. The model uses effluent and river ammonia, alkalinity, and total carbonate data to determine the probability density functions (PDFs) for the Monte Carlo simulations. Normal, lognormal, exponential and uniform probability distributions were tested using the Chi-square method and p-value associated with it to choose the best fit to the random data selected from the East Burlington wastewater treatment plant in North Carolina and the Clinch River in Tennessee. It is suggested that different options be tested with a minimum of three classes and a maximum of n/5 classes (n = number of data points) and the highest probability (p-value) for the PDF being tested be chosen. The results indicted that six violations to the EPA criterion for maximum concentration (CMC) were predicted when using 2000 RMC simulations and PDFs fitted to the available data, which violate the current criterion of no more than one violation over 3 years. All violations occur when the pH of the blend ranges from 8.0 to 9.0. No violations were found to the criteria of chronic concentration (CCC) using RMC.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 145
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk analysis using monte carlo simulation and bayesian networks
    Flores, Claudio
    Makiyama, Fernando
    Nassar, Silvia
    Freitas, Paulo
    Jacinto, Carlos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2006, : 2292 - 2292
  • [32] MONTE CARLO SIMULATION: A TOOL FOR RISK ANALYSIS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
    Herzog, Lusianny Pereira
    Silva, Everson Jonatha Gomes da
    Weymar, Guilherme Jahnecke
    REVISTA DE GESTAO E PROJETOS, 2024, 15 (03): : 542 - 565
  • [33] Failure risk analysis of riverbank ripraps with Monte Carlo simulation
    Jafarnejad, Mona
    Pfister, Michael
    Schleiss, Anton J.
    RIVER FLOW 2012, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 1325 - 1330
  • [34] Compartment fire risk analysis by advanced Monte Carlo simulation
    Au, Siu Kui
    Wang, Zhi-Hua
    Lo, Siu-Ming
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2007, 29 (09) : 2381 - 2390
  • [35] Stochastic risk analysis in Monte Carlo simulation: a case study
    Khalfi, Linda
    Ourbih-Tari, Megdouda
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 49 (11) : 3041 - 3053
  • [36] Quantitative risk analysis: A guide to Monte Carlo simulation modeling
    Scott, GC
    INTERFACES, 1998, 28 (02) : 132 - 133
  • [37] Risk Analysis of Construction Schedule Based on Monte Carlo Simulation
    Wang Xing-xia
    Huang Jian-wen
    2009 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER NETWORK AND MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY (CNMT 2009), VOLUMES 1 AND 2, 2009, : 48 - +
  • [38] Quantitative risk analysis: A guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling
    van den Hout, W
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 12 (01) : 89 - 89
  • [39] Monte Carlo simulation banishes the risk
    不详
    BWK, 2006, 58 (1-2): : 18 - 19
  • [40] Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment
    Greenland, S
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (04) : 579 - 583