Influence of 320-detector-row volume scanning and AAPM report 111 CT dosimetry metrics on size-specific dose estimate: a Monte Carlo study

被引:0
作者
Tomonobu Haba
Shuji Koyama
Yutaka Kinomura
Yoshihiro Ida
Masanao Kobayashi
机构
[1] Fujita Health University Hospital,Department of Radiology
[2] Nagoya University,Brain & Mind Research Center
[3] Fujita Health University,Faculty of Radiological Technology
来源
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine | 2016年 / 39卷
关键词
Size-specific dose estimate; 320-detector-row volume CT; AAPM task group 111; Monte Carlo simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) task group 204 has recommended the use of size-dependent conversion factors to calculate size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) values from volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) values. However, these conversion factors do not consider the effects of 320-detector-row volume computed tomography (CT) examinations or the new CT dosimetry metrics proposed by AAPM task group 111. This study aims to investigate the influence of these examinations and metrics on the conversion factors reported by AAPM task group 204, using Monte Carlo simulations. Simulations were performed modelling a Toshiba Aquilion ONE CT scanner, in order to compute dose values in water for cylindrical phantoms with 8–40-cm diameters at 2-cm intervals for each scanning parameter (tube voltage, bow-tie filter, longitudinal beam width). Then, the conversion factors were obtained by applying exponential regression analysis between the dose values for a given phantom diameter and the phantom diameter combined with various scanning parameters. The conversion factors for each scanning method (helical, axial, or volume scanning) and CT dosimetry method (i.e., the CTDI100 method or the AAPM task group 111 method) were in agreement with those reported by AAPM task group 204, within a percentage error of 14.2 % for phantom diameters ≥11.2 cm. The results obtained in this study indicate that the conversion factors previously presented by AAPM task group 204 can be used to provide appropriate SSDE values for 320-detector-row volume CT examinations and the CT dosimetry metrics proposed by the AAPM task group 111.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 703
页数:6
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Shope TB(1981)A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission X-ray computed tomography Med Phys 8 488-495
[2]  
Gagne RM(2011)CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing Radiology 259 311-316
[3]  
Johnson GC(2014)Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) provides a simple method to calculate organ dose for pediatric CT examinations Med Phys 41 071917-1710
[4]  
McCollough CH(2003)Investigation of lung nodule detectability in low-dose 320-slice computed tomography Med Phys 36 1700-300
[5]  
Leng S(2010)Scan time and patient dose for thoracic imaging in neonates and small children using axial volumetric 320-detector row CT compared to helical 64-, 32-, and 16-detector row CT acquisitions Pediatr Radiol 40 294-574
[6]  
Yu L(2011)Whole-brain dynamic CT angiography and perfusion imaging Clin Radiol 66 566-155
[7]  
Cody DD(2012)Evaluation of patient dose and operator dose in swallowing CT studies performed with a 320-detector-row multislice CT scanner Radiol Phys Technol 5 148-187
[8]  
Boone JM(2012)Dynamic four dimensional 320 section CT and carpal bone injury: a description of a novel technique to diagnose scapholunate instability Clin Radiol 67 185-380
[9]  
McNitt-Gray MF(1995)Computed tomography dose assessment: a practical approach Radiat Prot Dosim 57 377-1371
[10]  
Moore BM(2007)The trouble with CTDI Med Phys 34 1364-1280