Risk factors for glaucoma are reflected in abnormal responses to frequency-doubling technology screening in both normal and glaucoma eyes

被引:0
作者
Aiko Iwase
Tae Tsutsumi
Makoto Fujii
Shoichi Sawaguchi
Makoto Araie
机构
[1] Tajimi Iwase Eye Clinic,Department of Ophthalmology
[2] University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine,Division of Health and Sciences
[3] Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine
[4] University of the Ryukyu,undefined
[5] Kanto Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The frequency-doubling technology (FDT) screening test (FDT-C-20-1) has adopted in many recent population-based glaucoma surveys, but factors associated with false-positive (FP) responses to FDT-C-20-1 in normal eyes and false-negative (FN) responses in glaucoma eyes were not known. These factors were investigated in a population-based setting using the data from 3805 normal eyes (2381 subjects) and 272 eyes with definite glaucoma (215 subjects) in the Kumejima Study participants with reliable FDT-C-20-1 results. Considering the presence of at least one abnormal test point (P < 0.01) as abnormal, the specificity and sensitivity of FDT-C-20-1 for glaucoma were 91.8% (95% confidence interval, 91.1 ~ 92.5) and 56.3% (47.0 ~ 62.5), respectively. Multivariate linear mixed-model logistic regression analysis showed correlations with older age, worse visual acuity, greater β-peripapillary area (P < 0.001 for all comparisons) and more myopic refraction (P = 0.030) with the FP responses in normal eyes, and normal-tension glaucoma (P = 0.043), a better mean deviation value of Humphrey perimetry (P = 0.001), larger rim area (P = 0.041), and absence of disc hemorrhage (P = 0.015) with the FN responses in glaucoma eyes. In a population-based setting, abnormal responses to FDT-C-20-1 indicate the presence of a risk factor for glaucoma in normal eyes and risk factors for more rapid progression in glaucoma eyes.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Tham YC(2014)Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2014 Ophthalmology 121 2081-2090
[2]  
Foster PF(2002)The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys Br. J. Ophthalmol. 86 238-242
[3]  
Burhmann R(2002)Automated perimetry. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmology 109 2362-2374
[4]  
Quigley HA(2011)Assessment of visual function in glaucoma. A report by American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmology 118 986-1002
[5]  
Johnson GJ(2008)Short-wavelength automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma Prog. Brain Res. 173 101-124
[6]  
Delgado MF(2008)Screening tests for detecting open-angle glaucoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49 5373-5385
[7]  
Jampel HD(2004)The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese. The Tajimi Study Ophthalmology 111 1641-1648
[8]  
Fogagnolo P(2007)Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma. The Tajimi Study Ophthalmology 114 27-32
[9]  
Rossetti L(2008)Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population Ophthalmology 115 655-660
[10]  
Ranno S(2010)Prevalence of glaucoma in north China: The Beijing Eye Study Am. J. Ophthalmol. 150 917-924