Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ta-VNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial

被引:0
作者
Huajun Yang
Weixiong Shi
Jingjing Fan
Xiaoshan Wang
Yijun Song
Yajun Lian
Wei Shan
Qun Wang
机构
[1] Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Department of Neurology
[2] Capital Medical University,Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders
[3] Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Brain Hospital,undefined
[4] Tianjin Medical University General Hospital,undefined
[5] The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,undefined
[6] China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases,undefined
[7] Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders,undefined
[8] Capital Medical University,undefined
[9] Beijing Key Laboratory of Neuromodulation,undefined
来源
Neurotherapeutics | 2023年 / 20卷
关键词
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation; Neuromodulation; Drug-resistant epilepsy; Treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study explored the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in patients with epilepsy. A total of 150 patients were randomly divided into active stimulation group and control group. At baseline and 4, 12, and 20 weeks of stimulation, demographic information, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded; at 20 weeks, the patients underwent assessment of quality of life, Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scale, MINI suicide scale, and MoCA scale. Seizure frequency was determined according to the patient’s seizure diary. Seizure frequency reduction > 50% was considered effective. During our study, the antiepileptic drugs were maintained at a constant level in all subjects. At 20 weeks, the responder rate was significantly higher in active group than in control group. The relative reduction of seizure frequency in the active group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 20 weeks. Additionally, no significant differences were shown in QOL, HAMA, HAMD, MINI, and MoCA score at 20 weeks. The main adverse events were pain, sleep disturbance, flu-like symptoms, and local skin discomfort. No severe adverse events were reported in active and control group. There were no significant differences in adverse events and severe adverse events between the two groups. The present study showed that ta-VNS is an effective and safe therapy for epilepsy. Furthermore, the benefit in QOL, mood, and cognitive state of ta-VNS needs further validation in the future study although no significant improvement was shown in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 880
页数:10
相关论文
共 162 条
  • [1] Dua T(2006)Epilepsy care in the world: results of an ILAE/IBE/WHO Global Campaign Against Epilepsy survey Epilepsia 47 1225-1231
  • [2] de Boer HM(2017)Defeating epilepsy: a global public health commitment Epilepsia Open 2 153-155
  • [3] Prilipko LL(2000)Early identification of refractory epilepsy N Engl J Med 342 314-319
  • [4] Saxena S(2021)Neuromodulation in epilepsy: state-of-the-art approved therapies Lancet Neurol 20 1038-1047
  • [5] Saxena S(2020)Learnings from 30 years of reported efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for epilepsy treatment: a critical review Seizure 83 104-123
  • [6] Li S(1994)Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of partial seizures: 1. a controlled study of effect on seizures Epilepsia 35 616-626
  • [7] Kwan P(2019)Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy Neurosurg Clin N Am 30 219-230
  • [8] Brodie MJ(2019)Long-term outcome in neurostimulation of epilepsy Epilepsy Behav 91 25-29
  • [9] Ryvlin P(2021)Effect of long-term treatment with vagus nerve stimulation on mood and quality of life in korean patients with drug-resistant epilepsy J Clin Neurol 17 385-392
  • [10] Rheims S(2021)Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (t-VNS) and epilepsy: a systematic review of the literature Seizure 91 40-48