Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument

被引：84

作者：

Pamuk S. ^{[1
]}

Ergun M. ^{[2
]}

Cakir R. ^{[3
]}

Yilmaz H.B. ^{[4
]}

Ayas C. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Computer Education and Instructional Technology Department, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun

[2] Science Education Department, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun

[3] Computer Education and Instructional Technology Department, Amasya University, Amasya

[4] Educational Measurement and Evaluation Department, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun

[5] Social Studies Department, Sinop University, Sinop

来源：

Education and Information Technologies | 2015年 / 20卷 / 2期

关键词：

Preservice teachers’ technology use; Technological pedagogical content knowledge; Technology and teaching; TPACK; TPACK instrument;

D O I：

10.1007/s10639-013-9278-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Educators’ interest in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) has been increasing. In parallel with implementations of TPACK-based activities taking place in different settings, efforts for assessing effectiveness of those activities and understanding the overall TPACK framework have also been under investigation. In this study, the main purpose has been placed on understanding the TPACK framework and its dynamics that contribute to effective TPACK development. More specifically, through preservice teachers’ experiences we have explored the nature of relationships among the TPACK components. To do this, a TPACK instrument was developed and the data were analyzed by using multi-stage approaches. Results briefly indicated that all correlations among the components were significant. In the structural equation modeling analyses, TPK and TCK’s impact were statistically powerful contributors to explaining TPACK variance. In addition, and most important, our results suggest that second-level knowledge basis (TPK, TCK, PCK) had a stronger impact than core knowledge basis on predicting TPACK development. TCK in the structural model stands out as the mediator knowledge base. Finally, indirect relationships among some of the TPACK components were found to be of considerable importance. © 2013, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

引用

页码：241 / 263

页数：22

共 38 条

[1]

Agyei D.D., Voogt J., Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 4, pp. 547-564, (2012)

[2]

Angeli C., Valanides N., Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPACK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK), Computers & Education, 52, 1, pp. 154-168, (2009)

[3]

Arbuckle J.L., Amos 18 user’s guide, (2009)

[4]

Archambault L., The practitioner’s perspective on teacher education: Preparing for the K-12 online classroom, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19, 1, pp. 73-91, (2011)

[5]

Archambault L.M., Barnett J.H., Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework, Computers & Education, 55, 4, pp. 1656-1662, (2010)

[6]

Archambault L., Crippen K., Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 1, pp. 71-88, (2009)

[7]

Black J.A., Champion D.J., Methods and issues in social research, (1976)

[8]

Borg W.R., Gall M.D., Educational research, (1983)

[9]

Brown F.G., Principles of educational and psychological testing, (1970)

[10]

Chai C.S., Koh J.H.L., Tsai C.C., Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK), Educational Technology & Society, 13, 4, pp. 63-73, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 →