Environmental potential of fungal insulation: a prospective life cycle assessment of mycelium-based composites

被引:20
作者
Alaux, Nicolas [1 ]
Vasatko, Hana [2 ]
Maierhofer, Dominik [1 ]
Saade, Marcella Ruschi Mendes [1 ]
Stavric, Milena [2 ]
Passer, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Struct Design, Working Grp Sustainable Construct, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Architecture & Media, A-8010 Graz, Austria
关键词
Attributional life cycle assessment (A-LCA); Prospective LCA (pLCA); Ex ante LCA; Biogenic carbon; Mycelium-based composites; Circular economy; Whole life cycle; Cradle-to-grave; LCA; CARBON; REFURBISHMENT; BUILDINGS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-023-02243-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeBio-based insulation materials are one of the most promising solutions for reducing the environmental impacts of building envelopes. Among these materials, the environmental benefits of mycelium-based materials have merely been investigated, despite their promising technical and thermal properties. In this paper, we perform a first prospective cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of mycelium-based composite blocks.MethodsAn attributional cradle-to-gate LCA of the laboratory production of mycelium-based composites was first performed, including 11 environmental impact indicators. Then, scenarios were defined to scale up the technology to the level of industrial production, including the remaining life cycle modules to perform a cradle-to-grave analysis. Biogenic and metabolic carbon were considered by applying the static -1/+1 approach and following the current LCA standards. Future-oriented energy and transport mixes were also included as an additional scenario, systematically modifying both the foreground and background data. Finally, the industrially scaled-up technology and alternative insulation materials were compared with these future conditions (as applied to both materials).Results and discussionConsidering climate change, the results are encouraging in comparison to those for traditional plastic insulation, but do not necessarily surpass those for other existing materials such as rock wool. However, trade-offs are observed in other indicators, for which mycelium-based composites tend to perform worse than traditional insulation materials. The industrial scale-up reduced impacts for most indicators, but a considerable trade-off was observed with regard to terrestrial ecotoxicity. The main driver for the remaining greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions was found to be the electricity use during the manufacturing phase. We consider the inclusion of the other life cycle stages as relevant, as this increased the GHG emissions by 10%. Limitations of the current LCA standards, however, are noted and discussed, especially regarding the cascading use of biogenic materials, and highlight the relevance of this case study.ConclusionsMycelium-based composites show a potential for future development, but careful attention should be paid to reducing electricity needs in their manufacturing process. Further improvements could also be made by using fast-growing biogenic materials as a substrate. In particular, we encourage researchers to include all of the life cycle stages in future studies, especially if biogenic emissions are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 272
页数:18
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Alaux N., 2022, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DOI [10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012050, 10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012050]
[2]   Future trends in materials manufacturing for low carbon building stocks: A prospective macro-scale analysis at the provincial level [J].
Alaux, Nicolas ;
Saade, Marcella Ruschi Mendes ;
Hoxha, Endrit ;
Truger, Barbara ;
Passer, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 382
[3]   The search for an appropriate end-of-life formula for the purpose of the European Commission Environmental Footprint initiative [J].
Allacker, Karen ;
Mathieux, Fabrice ;
Pennington, David ;
Pant, Rana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (09) :1441-1458
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, MIN DAMMST STEINW
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, [No title captured]
[7]   Carbon sequestration and storage in the built environment [J].
Arehart, Jay H. ;
Hart, Jim ;
Pomponi, Francesco ;
D'Amico, Bernardino .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 27 :1047-1063
[8]   Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA [J].
Arvidsson, Rickard ;
Tillman, Anne-Marie ;
Sanden, Bjorn A. ;
Janssen, Matty ;
Nordelof, Anders ;
Kushnir, Duncan ;
Molander, Sverker .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 22 (06) :1286-1294
[9]   A review of unconventional sustainable building insulation materials [J].
Asdrubali, Francesco ;
D'Alessandro, Francesco ;
Schiavoni, Samuele .
SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, 4 :1-17
[10]  
Bau EPD GmbH, 2017, PKR ANL BAUPR