Nutrient removal by biomass accumulation on artificial substrata in the northern Baltic Sea

被引:0
作者
Milla Suutari
Elina Leskinen
Kristian Spilling
Kirsi Kostamo
Jukka Seppälä
机构
[1] University of Helsinki,Department of Environmental Sciences
[2] University of Helsinki,Tvärminne Zoological Station
[3] Finnish Environment Institute,undefined
来源
Journal of Applied Phycology | 2017年 / 29卷
关键词
Macroalgae; Invertebrates; Bioremediation; Eutrophication; Nutrient and heavy metal content; Baltic Sea;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We studied the potential of utilizing non-seeded artificial substrata in growing macrofauna and macroalgae to remove excess nutrients from seawater in the northern Baltic Sea. Succession, species composition, and biomass on two different substratum types were studied. Organic carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) as well as heavy metal (As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) contents were measured from the algal species and the invertebrate fraction. The invertebrate fraction formed more than 94% of the total biomass and consisted of blue mussels (Mytilus trossulus), bay barnacles (Amphibalanus improvisus), and hydroids (Cordylophora caspia and Gonothyraea loveni). Major algal species consisted of green algae Ulva spp. and Cladophora glomerata, red algae Ceramium tenuicorne and Polysiphonia fibrillosa, and filamentous brown algae Pylaiella littoralis and Ectocarpus siliculosus. The highest biomasses were measured at the end of the experiment, after 14.5 months of exposure in the sea, when the total biomass was on average 2.4 kg dry weight (DW) m−2 substratum, containing approximately 50 g N and 5 g P. The heavy metal concentrations were site and species dependent and on average lower in the invertebrate fraction compared with the macroalgal fraction. In some cases especially, Cd may limit biomass use as fertilizers. According to these results, annual N and P emissions from small-sized point sources could be reduced by using artificial substrata to remove sessile organisms, but this would require extensive cultivations. Furthermore, the utilization of the marine macroalgal and invertebrate biomass in biogas production requires adding more carbon-rich feedstock to obtain optimal results.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1720
页数:13
相关论文
共 258 条
[1]  
Ahmed N(2016)Can “integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA)” adapt to climate change in coastal Bangladesh? Ocean Coast Manage 132 120-131
[2]  
Glacer M(1999)Species diversity and distribution of aquatic macrophytes in the Northern Quark, Baltic Sea Nord J Bot 19 375-383
[3]  
Bergström L(2011)Bioenergy potential of Biores Tech 102 2595-2604
[4]  
Bergström U(2014): biomass yield, methane production and combustion Sci Total Environ 473–474 298-307
[5]  
Bruhn A(1990)Nutrient content in macrophyta collected from southern Baltic Sea beaches in relation to eutrophication and biogas production Ambio 19 109-111
[6]  
Dahl J(2003)Biological effects of eutrophication in the Baltic Sea, particularly the coastal zone Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44 298-306
[7]  
Nielsen HB(2008)The uptake of Cd, Cr, and Zn by the macroalga Bioresour Tech 99 4044-4064
[8]  
Nikolaisen L(2016) and subsequent transfer to the marine herbivorous Rabbitfish, Aquaculture 453 54-66
[9]  
Rasmussen MB(2003)Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review Water Res 37 4311-4330
[10]  
Markager S(2005)Role of deposit feeders in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture—a model analysis Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 63 385-396