Yes, She Was!Reply to Ford’s “Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room”

被引：0
|
作者：
William J. Rapaport
机构：
[1] University at Buffalo,Department of Computer Science and Engineering
[2] The State University of New York,Department of Philosophy
[3] University at Buffalo,Department of Linguistics
[4] The State University of New York,Center for Cognitive Science
[5] University at Buffalo,undefined
[6] The State University of New York,undefined
[7] University at Buffalo,undefined
[8] The State University of New York,undefined
来源：
Minds and Machines | 2011年 / 21卷
关键词：
Chinese room argument; Syntactic semantics; Searle;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Ford’s “Helen Keller Was Never in a Chinese Room” claims that my argument in “How Helen Keller Used Syntactic Semantics to Escape from a Chinese Room” fails because Searle and I use the terms ‘syntax’ and ‘semantics’ differently, hence are at cross purposes. Ford has misunderstood me; this reply clarifies my theory.
引用
收藏
页码：3 / 17
页数：14
相关论文
共 5 条
1