Collective (in) efficacy, substance abuse and violence in “Freedom Park,” Cape Town

被引:0
作者
Mercy Brown-Luthango
机构
[1] University of Cape Town,African Centre for Cities, School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics, Room 2.11, Environmental and Geographical Science Building, Upper Campus
来源
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment | 2016年 / 31卷
关键词
Housing; Informal control; Social cohesion; Substance abuse; Urban upgrading; Violence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Using collective efficacy as a lens, the paper tries to understand high levels of violence and crime within an urban settlement in Cape Town, which has recently undergone an upgrading process from an informal into a formal settlement. Theory and evidence from North America are that collective efficacy (social cohesion and informal control) has a significant bearing on levels of violence and crime and impacts on the ability of a community to regulate antisocial behavior. The paper has three main concerns, namely (a) the impact of the upgrading project on social cohesion within the settlement (b) the impact of an apparent decrease in social cohesion on informal measures of social control and the community’s ability to regulate crime and violence in the settlement and (c) how the presence of a concentration of illegal liquor and drug outlets affects collective efficacy and levels of violence and crime in turn. Research in Freedom Park reveals that the upgrading project did seem to diminish levels of social cohesion, marked by trust and solidarity, within the settlement. Whereas residents had previously depended on one another to maintain order and safety within the settlement, after upgrading, these informal arrangements and support structures have all but disappeared. A proliferation of illegal alcohol and drug outlets has simultaneously contributed to increasing levels of violence and crime and eroded social cohesion among residents. This research shows that while collective efficacy does provide a useful starting point, given the complex nature of violence and crime, it cannot be considered in isolation of broader structural constraints like poverty and unemployment, which feed into a vicious cycle of deprivation violence and crime in disadvantaged neighborhoods in cities of the South.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 140
页数:17
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Almgren G(2005)The ecological context of interpersonal violence: From culture to collective efficacy Journal of Interpersonal Violence 20 218-224
  • [2] Browning C(2002)The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence Journal of Marriage and Family 64 833-850
  • [3] Browning C(2004)The paradox of social organization: Networks, collective efficacy, and violent crime in urban neighborhoods Social Forces 83 503-534
  • [4] Browning CR(2002)Neighborhood structural disadvantage, collective efficacy and self-rated physical health in an urban setting American Sociological Association 43 383-399
  • [5] Cagney KA(2011)The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability Sustainable Development 19 289-300
  • [6] Dempsey N(2002)A multilevel analysis of neighborhood context and youth alcohol and drug problems Prevention Science 3 125-133
  • [7] Duncan SC(2003)A multilevel contextual model of neighborhood collective efficacy American Journal of Community Psychology 32 245-252
  • [8] Duncan TE(2005)Drug use, misuse and the urban environment Drug and Alcohol Review 24 127-136
  • [9] Galea S(2001)Spatial dynamics of alcohol availability, neighborhood structure and violent crime Journal of Studies on Alcohol 62 628-636
  • [10] Gorman DM(2004)Social implications of housing diversifications in urban renewal: A review of recent literature Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 19 367-390