Temporal Progression of Bean Common Bacterial Blight (Xanthomonas Campestris pv. phaseoli) in Sole and Intercropping Systems

被引:0
作者
C. Fininsa
J. Yuen
机构
[1] Alemaya University,Department of Plant Sciences
[2] Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Department of Ecology and Crop Production Science
来源
European Journal of Plant Pathology | 2002年 / 108卷
关键词
disease progress; epidemiology; planting pattern;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effects of four planting patterns of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) (bean only, maize–bean (MB), sorghum–bean (SB), and maize–bean–sorghum (MBS)) and four cropping systems (sole cropping, row, mixed, and broadcast intercropping) on the temporal epidemics of bean common bacterial blight (CBB) caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli were studied. The experiments were conducted during two consecutive spring and summer seasons in 1999 and 2000 in replicated field experiments. The Gompertz model described disease progress curves better than the logistic model. Intercropping delayed epidemic onset, lowered disease incidence and severity, and reduced the disease progress rate. The type of cropping system and planting pattern affected CBB incidence and severity at initial, final and overall assessments and also affected the rate of disease development. Statistical significance of treatment interactions based on disease assessments was found for incidence in all four experiments and for severity in three experiments. A slower disease progress rate and lower incidence and severity occurred on beans planted with maize or sorghum in row, mixed and broadcast intercropping than on bean planted alone. Incidence was reduced 36% and severity 20% in intercropping compared to sole cropping. The built-in disease delay and the slowing of the disease progress rate could provide protection for beans from severe CBB epidemics in intercropped systems. Variation between years appeared to be related to relative humidity (RH).
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 495
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Aggarwal PK(1992)Resource use and plant interaction in a rice-mungbean intercrop Agronomy Journal 84 71-78
[2]  
Garrity DP(1981)Comparison of the Gompertz and logistic equations to describe plant disease progress Phytopathology 71 716-719
[3]  
Liboon SP(1993)Effect of intercropping with maize on the severity of angular leaf spot of beans in Kenya Plant Pathology 42 16-25
[4]  
Morris RA(1992)Mechanisms of alterations in bean rust epidemiology due to intercropping with maize Phytopathology 82 1051-1060
[5]  
Berger RD(1994)Mechanisms of alterations in bean rust development due to intercropping, in computer simulated epidemics Ecological Applications 4 729-740
[6]  
Boudreau MA(1984)The role and importance of pathogens in natural plant communities Annual Review of Phytopathology 22 443-466
[7]  
Boudreau MA(1996)Effect of intercropping bean with maize on bean common bacterial blight and rust diseases International Journal of Pest Management 42 51-54
[8]  
Mundt CC(1997)Effects of planting pattern, relative planting date and intra-row spacing on a haricot bean/maize intercrop African Crop Science Journal 5 15-22
[9]  
Boudreau MA(2001)Association of bean rust and common bacterial blight epidemics with cropping systems in Hararghe highlands, eastern Ethiopia International Journal of Pest Management 47 211-219
[10]  
Mundt CC(2000)Effects of planting density and the composition of wheat cultivar mixtures on stripe rust: an analysis taking into account limits to the replication of controls Phytopathology 90 1313-1321