CT imaging in acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic strategies

被引:0
作者
Joachim E. Wildberger
Andreas H. Mahnken
Marco Das
Axel Küttner
Michael Lell
Rolf W. Günther
机构
[1] University of Technology (RWTH),Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital
[2] Eberhard Karls University,Department of Diagnostic Radiology
[3] Friedrich Alexander University,Department of Diagnostic Radiology
来源
European Radiology | 2005年 / 15卷
关键词
Diagnostic algorithms; Diagnostic CT; Pulmonary embolism; Thoracic chest CT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTA) has increasingly become accepted as a widely available, safe, cost-effective, and accurate method for a quick and comprehensive diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Pulmonary catheter angiography is still considered the gold standard and final imaging method in many diagnostic algorithms. However, spiral CTA has become established as the first imaging test in clinical routine due to its high negative predictive value for clinically relevant PE. Despite the direct visualization of clot material, depiction of cardiac and pulmonary function in combination with the quantification of pulmonary obstruction helps to grade the severity of PE for further risk stratification and to monitor the effect of thrombolytic therapy. Because PE and deep venous thrombosis are two different aspects of the same disease, additional indirect CT venography may be a valuable addition to the initial diagnostic algorithm—if this was positive for PE—and demonstration of the extent and localization of deep venous thrombosis has an impact on clinical management. Additional and alternate diagnoses add to the usefulness of this method. Using advanced multislice spiral CT technology, some practitioners have advocated CTA as the sole imaging tool for routine clinical assessment in suspected acute PE. This will simplify standards of practice in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 929
页数:10
相关论文
共 531 条
[61]  
Curtin JJ(1999)Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment Am J Roentgenol 172 1627-542
[62]  
Mewissen MW(2000)Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram—prospective comparison with scintigraphy Radiology 215 535-72
[63]  
Foley WD(2001)Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT? Eur Radiol 11 65-21
[64]  
Lipchik RJ(2001)The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation–perfusion scans Am J Med 110 16-467
[65]  
Crain MR(2002)Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study Radiology 223 461-491
[66]  
Sagar KB(2002)Negative spiral CT in acute pulmonary embolism Acta Radiol 43 486-1920
[67]  
Collier BD(2002)Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study Lancet 360 1914-314
[68]  
VanRossum AB(2003)Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study in 510 patients Ann Intern Med 138 307-2038
[69]  
Pattynama PMT(2003)Clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative helical computed tomographic results in whom anticoagulation is withheld Arch Intern Med 163 2033-36
[70]  
Ton ER(2004)Clinical validity of negative helical computed tomography for clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism Respiration 71 30-504