Understanding Conceptual Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Policy: The Role of Policymaking Conditions

被引:0
作者
Jakob Edler
Maria Karaulova
Katharine Barker
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research,Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Alliance Manchester Business School
[2] University of Manchester,undefined
来源
Minerva | 2022年 / 60卷
关键词
Science policy; Discursive institutionalism; Research-informed policy; Research impact;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a framework to understand the impact of scientific knowledge on the policy-making process, focusing on the conceptual impact. We note the continuing dissatisfaction with the quality and effects of science-policy interactions in both theory and practice. We critique the current literature’s emphasis on the efforts of scientists to generate policy impact, because it neglects the role of ‘user’ policymaking organisations. The framework offered in the paper develops an argument about the essential role of institutional conditions of policy ‘users’ for scientific knowledge to achieve impact. The framework is informed by the reflexive institutionalist and the neo-institutionalist theoretical approaches. Its main contribution is in outlining the intra- and inter-organisational conditions of policymaking organisations, along with personal characteristics of individual policy officials that influence the likelihood of scientific knowledge to generate conceptual impact. We also offer an operationalisation of the framework. The wider relevance of the paper is in moving the focus from the activities of scientists and the incentive structure in scientific organisations to the policy user side.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 233
页数:24
相关论文
共 183 条
[1]  
Almeida Celia(2006)Use of research results in policy decision-making, formulation, and implementation: a review of the literature Cadernos De Saúde Pública 22 7-19
[2]  
Báscolo Ernesto(2004)New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies Science Communication 26 75-106
[3]  
Amara Nabil(2008)Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice Research Policy 37 353-369
[4]  
Ouimet Mathieu(2013)Sharing Research Equipment to Bridge Intraorganizational Boundaries Research-Technology Management 56 49-57
[5]  
Landry Rejean(2013)Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan Implementation Science 8 1-10
[6]  
Amin Ash(2014)What Do Policymakers Want From Us? Results of a Survey of Current and Former Senior National Security Decision Makers International Studies Quarterly 58 227-246
[7]  
Roberts Joanne(2005)Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective Social Policy & Administration 39 1-18
[8]  
Andereggen Stefan(2014)Knowledge Utilization in Canadian Health Service Organizations: A Path Analysis International Journal of Public Administration 37 339-352
[9]  
Zoller Frank Andreas(1997)"Any more bright ideas?" The ideational turn of comparative political economy Comparative Politics 29 229-250
[10]  
Boutellier Roman(2018)Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy Science and Public Policy 45 435-447