Does methylphenidate improve academic performance? A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Anne Fleur Kortekaas-Rijlaarsdam
Marjolein Luman
Edmund Sonuga-Barke
Jaap Oosterlaan
机构
[1] Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,Clinical Neuropsychology section
[2] King’s College London,Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience
来源
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry | 2019年 / 28卷
关键词
ADHD; Methylphenidate; Academic; Math; Reading; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Academic improvement is amongst the most common treatment targets when prescribing stimulants to children with ADHD. Previous reviews on stimulant-related academic improvements are inconclusive and focus on task engagement. Recent literature suggests outcome-domain-specific medication effects that are larger for productivity than for accuracy. The aims of this study are quantifying methylphenidate effects on academic productivity and accuracy for math, reading, spelling; exploring the mediating or moderating effects of symptom improvements, demographic-, design- and disorder-related variables. PubMed, EMBASE, ERIC and PsycINFO were searched for articles reporting methylphenidate effects on academic productivity and accuracy. Thirty-four studies met entry criteria. Methylphenidate improved math productivity (7.8% increase, p < .001); math accuracy (3.0% increase, p = .001); increased reading speed (SMD .47, p < .001) but not reading accuracy. None of the mediators or moderators tested affected methylphenidate efficacy. Academic improvements were small compared to symptom improvements; qualitative changes limited to math. Clinicians should take this discrepancy into account when prescribing medication for ADHD.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 164
页数:9
相关论文
共 152 条
  • [31] Arnold LE(2008)The effects of methylphenidate on word decoding accuracy in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder J Clin Psychopharmacol 34 47-192
  • [32] Hodgkins P(2007)A twin study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder dimensions rated by the strengths and weaknesses of ADHD-symptoms and normal-behavior (SWAN) scale Biol Psychiatry 327 557-634
  • [33] Kahle J(1998)Reliability and validity of the SKAMP rating scale in a laboratory school setting Psychopharmacol Bull 118 183-916
  • [34] Barkley RA(2003)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ Br Med J 315 629-816
  • [35] Varley CK(1995)Writing meta-analytic reviews Psychol Bull 335 914-232
  • [36] Nolan PA(1997)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 45 808-452
  • [37] Schachar R(2007)Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses BMJ 20 213-300
  • [38] Tannock R(2006)Effects of methylphenidate on subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 32 439-237
  • [39] Murray DW(1992)Single and combined effects of methylphenidate and behavior therapy on the classroom performance of children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder J Abnorm Child Psychol 20 293-776
  • [40] Childress A(1991)A dose-response analysis of the effects of methylphenidate on the peer interactions and simulated classroom performance of ADD children with and without conduct problems J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 86 226-501