An improved dual-polarized ratio algorithm for sea ice concentration retrieval from passive microwave satellite data and inter-comparison with ASI, ABA and NT2

被引:0
作者
Shugang Zhang
Jinping Zhao
Min Li
Shixuan Liu
Shuwei Zhang
机构
[1] Shandong Academy of Sciences,Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation
[2] Ocean University of China,College of Physical and Environmental Oceanography
来源
Journal of Oceanology and Limnology | 2018年 / 36卷
关键词
Arctic sea ice; sea ice concentration; algorithm; time series; Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS (AMSR-E);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The dual-polarized ratio algorithm (DPR) for the retrieval of Arctic sea ice concentration from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-EOS (AMSR-E) data was improved using a contrast ratio (CR) parameter. In contrast to three other algorithms (Artist Sea Ice algorithm, ASI; NASA-Team 2 algorithm, NT2; and AMSR-E Bootstrap algorithm, ABA), this algorithm does not use a series of tie-points or a priori values of brightness temperature of sea-ice constituents, such as open water and 100% sea ice. Instead, it is based on a ratio ( α ) of horizontally and vertically polarized sea ice emissivity at 36.5 GHz, which can be automatically determined by the CR. α exhibited a clear seasonal cycle: changing slowly during winter, rapidly at other times, and reaching a minimum during summer. The DPR was improved using a seasonal α. The systematic differences in the Arctic sea ice area over the complete AMSR-E period (2002–2011) were -0.8%±2.0% between the improved DPR and ASI; -1.3%±1.7% between the improved DPR and ABA; and -0.7%±1.9% between the improved DPR and NT2. The improved DPR and ASI (or ABA) had small seasonal differences. The seasonal differences between the improved DPR and NT2 decreased, except in summer. The improved DPR identified extremely low ice concentration regions in the Pacific sector of the central Arctic (north of 83°N) around August 12, 2010, which was confirmed by the Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition. A series of high-resolution MODIS images (250 m×250 m) of the Beaufort Sea during summer were used to assess the four algorithms. According to mean bias and standard deviations, the improved DPR algorithm performed equally well with the other three sea ice concentration algorithms. The improved DPR can provide reasonable sea ice concentration data, especially during summer.
引用
收藏
页码:1494 / 1508
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Comiso J C(2003)Sea ice concentration, ice temperature, and snow depth using AMSR-E Data IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 41 243-252
[2]  
Cavalieri D J(2015)Shortterm sea ice forecasting: an assessment of ice concentration and ice drift forecasts using the U.S Navy’s Arctic Cap Nowcast/Forecast System.^J. Geophys. Res. 120 8 327-8 345
[3]  
Markus T(2016)Melt pond distribution and geometry in high Arctic sea ice derived from aerial investigations Annals of Glaciology 57 105-118
[4]  
Hebert D A(2010)Improving passive microwave sea ice concentration algorithms for coastal areas: applications to the Baltic Sea Tellus A 62 393-410
[5]  
Allard R A(2000)An enhancement of the^NASA team sea ice algorithm IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 1 387-1 398
[6]  
Metzger E J(2016)The stratospheric pathway for Arctic impacts on midlatitude climate Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 3 494-3 501
[7]  
Posey P G(2015)Arctic sea ice trends, variability and implications for seasonal ice forecasting Philos ophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 373 20140159-6 340
[8]  
Preller R H(2016)Using timing of ice retreat to predict timing of fall freeze-up in the Arctic Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 6 332-7 475
[9]  
Wallcraft A J(2015)Empirical error functions for monthly mean Arctic sea-ice drift J. Geophys. Res. 120 7 450-5 982
[10]  
Phelps M W(2015)Seasonal evolution of melt ponds on Arctic sea ice J. Geophys. Res. 120 5 968-1 072