The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention

被引:0
作者
Xianwen Wang
Chen Liu
Wenli Mao
Zhichao Fang
机构
[1] Dalian University of Technology,WISE Lab, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
来源
Scientometrics | 2015年 / 103卷
关键词
Article-level metrics; Usage metrics; Altmetrics; Open access; Social media attention; Open access advantage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we compare the difference in the impact between open access (OA) and non-open access (non-OA) articles. 1761 Nature Communications articles published from 1 January 2012 to 31 August 2013 are selected as our research objects, including 587 OA articles and 1174 non-OA articles. Citation data and daily updated article-level metrics data are harvested directly from the platform of nature.com. Data is analyzed from the static versus temporal-dynamic perspectives. The OA citation advantage is confirmed, and the OA advantage is also applicable when extending the comparing from citation to article views and social media attention. More important, we find that OA papers not only have the great advantage of total downloads, but also have the feature of keeping sustained and steady downloads for a long time. For article downloads, non-OA papers only have a short period of attention, when the advantage of OA papers exists for a much longer time.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 564
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Akre O(2009)Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: Do they reflect inequalities in access to publication? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 65 119-123
[2]  
Barone-Adesi F(2004)Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries 65 372-382
[3]  
Pettersson A(2003)An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 1062-1068
[4]  
Pearce N(2006)Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 512-517
[5]  
Merletti F(2010)Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research PLoS ONE 5 e13636-58
[6]  
Richiardi L(2009)Open access archiving and article citations within health services and policy research Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association 30 51-481
[7]  
Antelman K(2009)The Antaeus column: does the “open access” advantage exist? A librarian’s perspective Library Review 58 477-64
[8]  
Davis PM(2010)Usage bibliometrics Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 44 1-493
[9]  
Solla LR(2013)Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark Nature 500 491-2054
[10]  
Duy J(2001)Online or invisible Nature 411 521-17