Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients

被引:0
|
作者
D. Marsh
K. Åkesson
D. E. Beaton
E. R. Bogoch
S. Boonen
M.-L. Brandi
A. R. McLellan
P. J. Mitchell
J. E. M. Sale
D. A. Wahl
机构
[1] University College London,Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science
[2] Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital,Department of Orthopedics
[3] Skåne University Hospital Malmö,Mobility Program Clinical Research Unit
[4] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital
[5] St. Michael’s Hospital,Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics and Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Experimental Medicine
[6] University of Toronto,Department of Internal Medicine
[7] Leuven University,School of Health, Faculty of Education, Health and Sciences
[8] University of Florence,Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
[9] Western Infirmary and University of Glasgow,undefined
[10] University of Derby,undefined
[11] University of Toronto,undefined
[12] International Osteoporosis Foundation,undefined
来源
Osteoporosis International | 2011年 / 22卷
关键词
Clinical systems; FLS; Fracture prevention; IOF; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic fracture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The underlying causes of incident fractures—bone fragility and the tendency to fall—remain under-diagnosed and under-treated. This care gap in secondary prevention must be addressed to minimise both the debilitating consequences of subsequent fractures for patients and the associated economic burden to healthcare systems. Clinical systems aimed at ensuring appropriate management of patients following fracture have been developed around the world. A systematic review of the literature showed that 65% of systems reported include a dedicated coordinator who acts as the link between the orthopaedic team, the osteoporosis and falls services, the patient and the primary care physician. Coordinator-based systems facilitate bone mineral density testing, osteoporosis education and care in patients following a fragility fracture and have been shown to be cost-saving. Other success factors included a fracture registry and a database to monitor the care provided to the fracture patient. Implementation of such a system requires an audit of existing arrangements, creation of a network of healthcare professionals with clearly defined roles and the identification of a ‘medical champion’ to lead the project. A business case is needed to acquire the necessary funding. Incremental, achievable targets should be identified. Clinical pathways should be supported by evidence-based recommendations from national or regional guidelines. Endorsement of the proposed model within national healthcare policies and advocacy programmes can achieve alignment of the objectives of policy makers, professionals and patients. Successful transformation of care relies upon consensus amongst all participants in the multi-disciplinary team that cares for fragility fracture patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2051 / 2065
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Secondary Fracture Prevention
    Adler, Robert A.
    CURRENT OSTEOPOROSIS REPORTS, 2012, 10 (01): : 22 - 27
  • [22] Failure in the application of fragility fracture prevention guidelines
    Elvey, M. H.
    Pugh, H.
    Schaller, G.
    Dhotar, G.
    Patel, B.
    Oddy, M. J.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2014, 96 (05) : 381 - 385
  • [23] Patients reject the concept of fragility fracture—a new understanding based on fracture patients’ communication
    J. E. M. Sale
    M. A. Gignac
    L. Frankel
    G. Hawker
    D. Beaton
    V. Elliot-Gibson
    E. Bogoch
    Osteoporosis International, 2012, 23 : 2829 - 2834
  • [24] Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX®
    Martin-Sanchez, Mario
    Comas, Merce
    Posso, Margarita
    Louro, Javier
    Domingo, Laia
    Tebe, Cristian
    Castells, Xavier
    Espallargues, Mireia
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 105 (03) : 263 - 270
  • [25] The potential of assessment based on the WHO framework of intrinsic capacity in fragility fracture prevention
    Paolo Astrone
    Monica Rodrigues Perracini
    Finbarr C. Martin
    David R. Marsh
    Matteo Cesari
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2022, 34 : 2635 - 2643
  • [26] Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme
    Zinger, Gershon
    Sylvetsky, Noa
    Levy, Yedin
    Steinberg, Kobi
    Bregman, Alexander
    Yudkevich, Genady
    Peyser, Amos
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 33 (02) : 332 - 337
  • [27] Compliance with a pharmacological secondary fracture prevention policy
    Norman, Marilyn
    Parker, Martyn J.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2006, 37 (08): : 718 - 720
  • [28] Barriers to secondary fracture prevention in primary care
    Mendis, A. S.
    Ganda, K.
    Seibel, M. J.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (10) : 2913 - 2919
  • [29] Patients reject the concept of fragility fracture-a new understanding based on fracture patients' communication
    Sale, J. E. M.
    Gignac, M. A.
    Frankel, L.
    Hawker, G.
    Beaton, D.
    Elliot-Gibson, V.
    Bogoch, E.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 (12) : 2829 - 2834
  • [30] Knowledge of orthopaedic surgeons in managing patients with fragility fracture
    Reza Sorbi
    Mohamad Reza Aghamirsalim
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 1275 - 1279