Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients

被引:0
|
作者
D. Marsh
K. Åkesson
D. E. Beaton
E. R. Bogoch
S. Boonen
M.-L. Brandi
A. R. McLellan
P. J. Mitchell
J. E. M. Sale
D. A. Wahl
机构
[1] University College London,Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science
[2] Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital,Department of Orthopedics
[3] Skåne University Hospital Malmö,Mobility Program Clinical Research Unit
[4] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,Department of Surgery, St. Michael’s Hospital
[5] St. Michael’s Hospital,Division of Gerontology and Geriatrics and Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Experimental Medicine
[6] University of Toronto,Department of Internal Medicine
[7] Leuven University,School of Health, Faculty of Education, Health and Sciences
[8] University of Florence,Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
[9] Western Infirmary and University of Glasgow,undefined
[10] University of Derby,undefined
[11] University of Toronto,undefined
[12] International Osteoporosis Foundation,undefined
来源
Osteoporosis International | 2011年 / 22卷
关键词
Clinical systems; FLS; Fracture prevention; IOF; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic fracture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The underlying causes of incident fractures—bone fragility and the tendency to fall—remain under-diagnosed and under-treated. This care gap in secondary prevention must be addressed to minimise both the debilitating consequences of subsequent fractures for patients and the associated economic burden to healthcare systems. Clinical systems aimed at ensuring appropriate management of patients following fracture have been developed around the world. A systematic review of the literature showed that 65% of systems reported include a dedicated coordinator who acts as the link between the orthopaedic team, the osteoporosis and falls services, the patient and the primary care physician. Coordinator-based systems facilitate bone mineral density testing, osteoporosis education and care in patients following a fragility fracture and have been shown to be cost-saving. Other success factors included a fracture registry and a database to monitor the care provided to the fracture patient. Implementation of such a system requires an audit of existing arrangements, creation of a network of healthcare professionals with clearly defined roles and the identification of a ‘medical champion’ to lead the project. A business case is needed to acquire the necessary funding. Incremental, achievable targets should be identified. Clinical pathways should be supported by evidence-based recommendations from national or regional guidelines. Endorsement of the proposed model within national healthcare policies and advocacy programmes can achieve alignment of the objectives of policy makers, professionals and patients. Successful transformation of care relies upon consensus amongst all participants in the multi-disciplinary team that cares for fragility fracture patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2051 / 2065
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients
    Marsh, D.
    Akesson, K.
    Beaton, D. E.
    Bogoch, E. R.
    Boonen, S.
    Brandi, M. -L.
    McLellan, A. R.
    Mitchell, P. J.
    Sale, J. E. M.
    Wahl, D. A.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 22 (07) : 2051 - 2065
  • [2] Effect of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention on quality of life in patients with fragility fractures: a prospective randomized trial
    Okuda, R.
    Osaki, M.
    Saeki, Y.
    Okano, T.
    Tsuda, K.
    Nakamura, T.
    Morio, Y.
    Nagashima, H.
    Hagino, H.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 33 (07) : 1445 - 1455
  • [3] Effect of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention on quality of life in patients with fragility fractures: a prospective randomized trial
    R. Okuda
    M. Osaki
    Y. Saeki
    T. Okano
    K. Tsuda
    T. Nakamura
    Y. Morio
    H. Nagashima
    H. Hagino
    Osteoporosis International, 2022, 33 : 1445 - 1455
  • [4] Application of guidelines for secondary prevention of fracture and the FRAX index in patients with fragility fracture
    Naranjo, Antonio
    Ojeda-Bruno, Soledad
    Francisco-Hernandez, Felix
    Erausquin, Celia
    Rua-Figueroa, Inigo
    Rodriguez-Lozano, Carlos
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2011, 136 (07): : 290 - 292
  • [5] The importance of communication in secondary fragility fracture treatment and prevention
    L. M. Meadows
    L. A. Mrkonjic
    M. D. O’Brien
    W. Tink
    Osteoporosis International, 2007, 18 : 159 - 166
  • [6] The importance of communication in secondary fragility fracture treatment and prevention
    Meadows, L. M.
    Mrkonjic, L. A.
    O'Brien, M. D.
    Tink, W.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 18 (02) : 159 - 166
  • [7] Systematic approaches to fragility fracture prevention
    Mitchell, P. J. d
    Lee, D. B. d
    OSTEOLOGIE, 2014, 23 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [8] Impact of the guidance on fracture Liaison Services and the introduction of a new fee for secondary fracture prevention in Japan: Implementation of secondary fracture prevention during hospitalization for fragility fractures
    Gondo, Gaku
    Shin, Jung-ho
    Kunisawa, Susumu
    Imanaka, Yuichi
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 36 (02) : 235 - 244
  • [9] The potential of assessment based on the WHO framework of intrinsic capacity in fragility fracture prevention
    Astrone, Paolo
    Perracini, Monica Rodrigues
    Martin, Finbarr C.
    Marsh, David R.
    Cesari, Matteo
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (11) : 2635 - 2643
  • [10] Operative secondary prevention of fragility fractures: national clinical standards for fracture liaison service in Egypt—an initiative by the Egyptian Academy of Bone Health
    Naglaa Gadallah
    Yasser El Miedany
    Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 2022, 49