Validity, reliability and acceptability of the Japanese version of the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS)

被引:0
作者
T. Nakayama
H. Toyoda
K. Ohno
N. Yoshiike
T. Futagami
机构
[1] UCLA School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
[2] Waseda University,Department of Psychology
[3] Tokyo Medical and Dental University,Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine
[4] National Institute of Health and Nutrition,Division of Adult Health Science
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2000年 / 9卷
关键词
Acceptability; Factor analysis; General Well-Being Schedule; Questionnaire; Reliability; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS) is a widely used, self-administered questionnaire to measure subjective well-being. It contains 18 items and was originally hypothesized to have six domains; however, the following studies suggest other factorial models. We devised the schedule's Japanese edition following the standard procedure and tested its psychometric properties considering Japanese cultural characteristics. Subjects were 1224 middle-aged participants undergoing health checkups in Adachi, Tokyo. The reliability of the original version was high: alpha coefficient, 0.90; test–retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the structural validity of the 6-factor, the following 3-factor and 4-factor models (goodness of fit index: 0.932, 0.946 and 0.937, respectively). A new 3-factor model developed after the exclusion of item 11, which had no correlation with the other variables, was proved to have a higher fitness index (0.958) than the other models. This 17-item version showed adequate reliability (α coefficient, 0.91; test–retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85) and concurrent validity compared with the General Health Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Self-rating Depression Scale and Profile Of Mood State (correlation coefficients: −0.75 to −0.53). The median time required to complete the schedule was five minutes. Completing this instrument was easy for 80% of the subjects. These findings attest to the adequacy of the 17-item Japanese GWBS for the comprehensive assessment of individual inner state.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 539
页数:10
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Brook RH(1979)Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand's Health Insurance Study Med Care 17 1-131
[2]  
Ware JEJ(1993)A critical review of dimension– specific measures of health–related quality of life in cross– cultural research Qual Life Res 2 397-432
[3]  
Davies–Avery A(1981)Blood pressure awareness and psychological well–being in the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Clin Invest Med 4 183-189
[4]  
Naughton MJ(1980)Characteristics of life events and psychiatric impairment in rural communities J Nerv Ment Dis 168 159-166
[5]  
Wiklund I.(1986)Cross–sectional studies of per– sonality in a national sample: 1. Development and valida– tion of survey measures Psychol Aging 1 140-143
[6]  
Monk M.(1995)Psychological correlates of reported physical activity in normal–weight and obese adults: the Reno diet–heart study Int J Obes 19 S69-S72
[7]  
Husaini BA(1997)Coping resources and self–perceived well–being of college students who report a parental drinking problem J Am Coll Health 45 159-164
[8]  
Neff JA.(1983)Reliability and validity of five mental health scales in older persons J Gerontol 38 333-339
[9]  
Costa PTJ(1992)Job sharing: impact on the general well–being of female nurses Can J Nurs Adm 5 6-10
[10]  
McCrae RR.(1986)Psychological evaluation of well– being in the multidisciplinary assessment of osteoarthritis Clin Ther 9 S53-S63