Schumpeterian entrepreneurial digital identity and funding from venture capital firms

被引:0
作者
Jörn H. Block
Christian Fisch
Walter Diegel
机构
[1] Trier University,Faculty of Management
[2] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Erasmus School of Economics
[3] University of Luxembourg,Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT)
来源
The Journal of Technology Transfer | 2024年 / 49卷
关键词
Entrepreneurial identity; Digital identity; Venture capital; Schumpeterian entrepreneurship; Twitter; Text analysis; M13; O31; G24;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Schumpeterian entrepreneurs are considered agents of innovation and technology transfer. However, to fulfill this role, they need entrepreneurial finance. From the perspective of digital identity, we examine the relationship between a Schumpeterian digital identity and venture capital (VC) funding. Because the VC industry celebrates innovative and visionary entrepreneurship, we posit that a founder’s digital identity as a Schumpeterian-type entrepreneur influences the venture’s chances of receiving VC funding. A quantitative analysis of the language used by 3313 founders in a large sample of Twitter messages, however, provides a mixed picture. While some dimensions of Schumpeterian entrepreneurship have a positive relationship with the acquisition of resources from VC firms (entrepreneurial vision and optimism), other dimensions seem to have no (uncertainty tolerance and rationality) or even a decreasing (achievement motivation) effect. The negative relationships observed can be explained by the particularities of the VC business model, which does not align with Schumpeterian entrepreneurship in all respects. Our study contributes to research on Schumpeterian entrepreneurship, the financing of technology transfer, and the link between entrepreneurial digital identity and entrepreneurial finance. From a practical perspective, the results of our study demonstrate the limits of VC with regard to the financing of technology transfer and highlight the need for public funding through governmental VC or agencies for (disruptive) innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 157
页数:38
相关论文
共 348 条
[1]  
Acs ZJ(2009)The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship Small Business Economics 32 15-30
[2]  
Braunerhjelm P(2018)Unicorns, gazelles, and other distractions on the way to understanding real entrepreneurship in the United States Academy of Management Perspectives 32 458-472
[3]  
Audretsch DB(2007)Inventor perseverance after being told to quit: The role of cognitive biases Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 20 253-272
[4]  
Carlsson B(2016)Entrepreneurial finance and technology transfer The Journal of Technology Transfer 41 1-9
[5]  
Aldrich HE(2012)Entrepreneurship and innovation: Public policy frameworks The Journal of Technology Transfer 37 1-17
[6]  
Ruef M(2014)The resilience of the entrepreneur. Influence on the success of the business. A longitudinal analysis Journal of Economic Psychology 42 126-135
[7]  
Åstebro T(2004)Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups Journal of Business Venturing 19 411-436
[8]  
Jeffrey SA(2016)The impact of venture capital monitoring The Journal of Finance 71 1591-1622
[9]  
Adomdza GK(2019)Private equity and financial fragility during the crisis The Review of Financial Studies 32 1309-1373
[10]  
Audretsch DB(2011)Venture capital financing and the growth of high-tech start-ups: Disentangling treatment from selection effects Research Policy 40 1028-1043