Accuracy of acetabular cup placement during anterolateral supine total hip arthroplasty using intraoperative fluoroscopy: a retrospective study

[1] Kennedy JG(1998)Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration J Arthroplasty 13 530-534

[2] Rogers WB(2006)Acetabular component orientation in 834 total hip arthroplasties using a manual technique Clin Orthop Relat Res 445 186-191

[3] Soffe KE(2016)A forty millimeter head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty-eight millimeter head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system Int Orthop 40 2031-2039

[4] Sullivan RJ(2018)Accuracy of cup positioning with the computed tomography-based two-dimensional to three-dimensional matched navigation system: a prospective, randomized controlled study J Arthroplasty 33 136-143

[5] Griffen DG(2014)Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study J Arthroplasty 29 786-791

[6] Sheehan LJ(2009)A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series J Arthroplasty 24 698-704

[7] Minoda Y(2018)Pelvic positioning in the supine position leads to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty Bone Joint J. 100 1280-1288

[8] Kadowaki T(2015)What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473 3860-3866

[9] Kim M(1978)Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 217-220

[10] Tsuda K(2019)Accuracy of cup orientation and learning curve of the accelerometer-based portable navigation system for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 27 2309499019848871-712

[1] Kennedy JG(1998)Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration J Arthroplasty 13 530-534

[2] Rogers WB(2006)Acetabular component orientation in 834 total hip arthroplasties using a manual technique Clin Orthop Relat Res 445 186-191

[3] Soffe KE(2016)A forty millimeter head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty-eight millimeter head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system Int Orthop 40 2031-2039

[4] Sullivan RJ(2018)Accuracy of cup positioning with the computed tomography-based two-dimensional to three-dimensional matched navigation system: a prospective, randomized controlled study J Arthroplasty 33 136-143

[5] Griffen DG(2014)Total hip arthroplasty using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation: a prospective randomized study J Arthroplasty 29 786-791

[6] Sheehan LJ(2009)A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series J Arthroplasty 24 698-704

[7] Minoda Y(2018)Pelvic positioning in the supine position leads to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty Bone Joint J. 100 1280-1288

[8] Kadowaki T(2015)What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473 3860-3866

[9] Kim M(1978)Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 217-220

[10] Tsuda K(2019)Accuracy of cup orientation and learning curve of the accelerometer-based portable navigation system for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 27 2309499019848871-712