Inclusion of soils and soil-like bodies of urban territories into the Russian soil classification system

被引:0
作者
T. V. Prokof’eva
M. I. Gerasimova
O. S. Bezuglova
K. A. Bakhmatova
A. A. Gol’eva
S. N. Gorbov
E. A. Zharikova
N. N. Matinyan
E. N. Nakvasina
N. E. Sivtseva
机构
[1] Moscow State University,Faculty of Soil Science
[2] Moscow State University,Faculty of Geography
[3] Southern Federal University,Institute of Geography
[4] Saint Petersburg State University,Institute of Soil Science, Far East Division
[5] Russian Academy of Sciences,Research Institute of Applied Ecology of the North
[6] Russian Academy of Sciences,undefined
[7] Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University,undefined
[8] Ammosov Northeastern Federal University,undefined
来源
Eurasian Soil Science | 2014年 / 47卷
关键词
urban soils; technogenic layers; technogenic horizons; urbanozems; urbostratozems;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The results of the Internet discussion on the classification of urban soils aimed at evaluating their possible inclusion into the modern Russian soil classification system adopted by a wide range of specialists are presented. The first step was to address the urban diagnostic horizons as the basis for identifying soil types according to the rules of the Russian soil classification. New diagnostic horizons were proposed for urban soils: urbic (UR), filled compost-mineral (RAT), and filled peat (RT). The combination of these horizons with other diagnostic horizons and layers of technogenic materials correspond to different soil types. At the subtype level, the diagnostic properties (qualifiers) that may reflect both natural phenomena (gley, alkalinity) and technogenic impacts on the soils (urbistratified; phosphatic; or poorly expressed urban—ur, rat, rt) are used. Some corrections were proposed for the system of parent materials in urban environments. Urban soils formerly described in another nomenclature—urbanozems, urbiquasizems, and culturozems—are correlated with the taxa in all the trunks of the system. The proposals accepted can be used for the next updated version of the new Russian soil classification system.
引用
收藏
页码:959 / 967
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Dymov A A(2013)Properties of soils and soil-like bodies in the Vorkuta area Eur. Soil Sci 46 217-224
[2]  
Kaverin D A(2011)Possibilities of including the taxonomy of soils and parent materials of Moscow city into the classification system of the soils of Russia Eur. Soil Sci 44 572-575
[3]  
Gabov D N(2012)Bottom sediments in the seaward part of the Volga Delta: are they soils? Mater. VI All-Russia Soil Sci. Congr. 3 77-78
[4]  
Lebedeva I I(2011)Classification of Moscow soils and parent materials and its possible inclusion in the classification system of Russian soils Eur. Soil Sci 44 561-571
[5]  
Gerasimova M I(2013)Some features of soil organic matter in parks and adjacent residential areas of Moscow Eur, Soil Sci 46 273-283
[6]  
Lychagin M Yu(2012)Pedogenesis in Caves and Underground Mines Materials VI All-Russia Congr. Soil Science Society 1m 219-220
[7]  
Tkachenko A N(2005)specific features of anthropogenic soils in botanical gardens of metropolises in the southern taiga subzone Eur. Soil Sci 38 966-972
[8]  
Prokof’eva T V(2001)Evolutionary-genetic classification of soils and nonsoil surface formations Eur. Soil Sci 34 577-583
[9]  
Martynenko I A(1986)Classification of Damaged Soils Transact. 13th Congr. Int. Soil Sci. Soc., Hamburg 3 1036-1037
[10]  
Ivannikov F A(1989)Classification of Soils in Urban Agglomerations Catena 16 269-275