Order of invasion affects the spatial distribution of a reciprocal intraguild predator

被引:0
作者
Tessa van der Hammen
André M. de Roos
Maurice W. Sabelis
Arne Janssen
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,Section of Population Biology, IBED
来源
Oecologia | 2010年 / 163卷
关键词
Predator–prey interactions; Predatory mites; Antipredator behaviour; Intraguild predation; Distribution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When intraguild predation is reciprocal, i.e. two predator species kill and feed on each other, theory predicts that well-mixed populations of the two species cannot coexist. At low levels of the shared resource, only the best competitor exists, whereas if the level of the common resource is high, the first species to arrive on a patch can reach high numbers, which prevents the invasion of the second species through intraguild predation. The order of invasion may therefore be of high importance in systems with reciprocal intraguild predation with high levels of productivity, with the species arriving first excluding the other species. However, natural systems are not well mixed and usually have a patchy structure, which gives individuals the possibility to choose patches without the other predator, thus reducing opportunities for intraguild predation. Such avoidance behaviour can cause spatial segregation between predator species, which, in turn, may weaken the intraguild interaction strength and facilitate their co-occurrence in patchy systems. Using a simple set-up, we studied the spatial distribution of two reciprocal intraguild predators when either of them was given priority on a patch with food. We released females of two predatory mite species sequentially and found that both species avoided patches on which the other species was resident. This resulted in partial spatial segregation of the species and thus a lower chance for the two species to encounter each other. Such behaviour reinforces segregation, because heterospecifics avoid patches with established populations of the other species. This may facilitate coexistence of two intraguild predators that would exclude each other in well-mixed populations.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Agarwala BK(2003)Effect of conspecific and heterospecific feces on foraging and oviposition of two predatory ladybirds: role of fecal cues in predator avoidance J Chem Ecol 29 357-376
[2]  
Yasuda H(2007)Trade-offs, temporal variation, and species coexistence in communities with intraguild predation Ecology 88 2720-2728
[3]  
Kajita Y(2004)Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology Ecol Lett 7 557-564
[4]  
Amarasekare P(2007)Trophic supplements to intraguild predation Oikos 116 662-677
[5]  
Arim M(2000)Effects of enrichment on three-level food chains with omnivory Am Nat 155 200-218
[6]  
Marquet PA(2001)Intraguild prey suffer from enrichment of their resources: a microcosm experiment with ciliates Ecology 82 2977-2983
[7]  
Daugherty MP(2000)Kin recognition by the predatory mite Ecol Entomol 25 147-155
[8]  
Harmon JP(2001): discrimination among own, conspecific, and heterospecific eggs Exp Appl Acarol 25 613-623
[9]  
Briggs CJ(2008)Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterattacking prey Ecol Entomol 33 374-379
[10]  
Diehl S(2002)Domatia reduce larval cannibalism in predatory mites Ecology 83 643-652