Second- and third-line treatments in non-small cell lung cancer

被引:25
作者
Kumar A. [1 ]
Wakelee H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA 94305
关键词
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor; Docetaxel; Gemcitabine; Clin Oncol; Sorafenib;
D O I
10.1007/s11864-006-0030-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Slow but steady progress has been made in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. For first-line therapy, multiple chemotherapy combination therapies can extend survival and improve quality of life. And recently, for the first time ever, a noncytotoxic agent, the antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab, has been shown to improve survival when added to chemotherapy. Striking improvements have also been made in second-line treatment. In August 2004, only one agent was US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved in this setting, docetaxel, but by the beginning of 2005, two more were available, pemetrexed and erlotinib. All three of these drugs can significantly benefit patients, with 1-year survival in excess of 30%. Choosing between the three agents can be challenging, and this review focuses on the toxicity differences and predictors of response that can help guide this decision. Docetaxel and pemetrexed, both traditional intravenous cytotoxins, are excellent options for patients who have shown some response to first-line chemotherapy, but at this time, no other means exist to determine likelihood of response. When choosing between the two, pemetrexed causes significantly less neutropenia than does docetaxel, at least on the standard every-3-week regimen. With erlotinib, an oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, there are factors that can predict for response, including little or no smoking history, and adenocarcinoma histology. Therefore, patients who fit these characteristics are good candidates for second-line erlotinib. However, the relationship between response to erlotinib and improved survival remains unclear, and several laboratory analyses that may help further, such as evaluation of EGFR gene copy number, are still under development. Although erlotinib is the only FDA-approved option currently available for third-line therapy, many patients with good performance status may benefit from third-Llne therapy and beyond. In addition to the approved second-line options, other single-agent chemotherapies to consider for treatment beyond second-line are gemcitabine, irinotecan, and oral topotecan. Many new drugs, including bevacizumab, ZD6474 (AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE), sorafenib, cetuximab, paclitaxel poliglumex, epothilones, and others, alone or in combination with traditional agents, are currently undergoing investigation and hold great promise. Copyright © 2006 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 49
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Jemal A., Tiwari R.C., Murray T., Et al., Cancer statistics, 2004, CA Cancer J Clin, 54, pp. 8-29, (2004)
[2]  
Parkin D.M., Bray F., Ferlay J., Pisani P., Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000, Int J Cancer, 94, pp. 153-156, (2001)
[3]  
Ettinger D.S., Cox J.D., Ginsberg R.J., Et al., NCCN Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Practice Guidelines. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Oncology (Williston Park), 10, pp. 81-111, (1996)
[4]  
Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology, J Clin Oncol, 14, pp. 671-679, (1996)
[5]  
Kelly K., Crowley J., Bunn Jr. P.A., Et al., Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group trial, J Clin Oncol, 19, pp. 3210-3218, (2001)
[6]  
Schiller J.H., Harrington D., Belani C.P., Et al., Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, N Engl J Med, 346, pp. 92-98, (2002)
[7]  
Fossella F., Pereira J.R., von Pawel J., Et al., Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The TAX 326 study group, J Clin Oncol, 21, pp. 3016-3024, (2003)
[8]  
Sandler A., Gray R., Brahmer J.R., Et al., Randomized phase II/III trial of paclitaxel (P) plus carboplatin (C) with or without bevacizumab (NSC #704865) in patients with advanced non-squamous cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Trial--E4599, J Clin Oncol, 23, (2005)
[9]  
Shepherd F.A., Dancey J., Ramlau R., Et al., Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, J Clin Oncol, 18, pp. 2095-2103, (2000)
[10]  
Fossella F.V., DeVore R., Kerr R.N., Et al., Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group, J Clin Oncol, 18, pp. 2354-2362, (2000)