Education, Other Socioeconomic Characteristics Across the Life Course, and Fertility Among Finnish Men

被引:0
作者
Jessica Nisén
Pekka Martikainen
Mikko Myrskylä
Karri Silventoinen
机构
[1] University of Helsinki,Population Research Unit, Department of Social Research
[2] Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research,Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS)
[3] Stockholm University,Department of Social Policy
[4] Karolinska Institutet,School of Medicine
[5] London School of Economics,undefined
[6] Osaka University,undefined
来源
European Journal of Population | 2018年 / 34卷
关键词
Education; Socioeconomic differences; Fertility; Male fertility; Childlessness; Parity progression; Within-family design;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The level of education and other adult socioeconomic characteristics of men are known to associate with their fertility, but early-life socioeconomic characteristics may also be related. We studied how men’s adult and early-life socioeconomic characteristics are associated with their eventual fertility and whether the differences therein by educational level are explained or mediated by other socioeconomic characteristics. The data on men born in 1940–1950 (N = 37,082) were derived from the 1950 Finnish census, which is linked to later registers. Standard and sibling fixed-effects Poisson and logistic regression models were used. Education and other characteristics were positively associated with the number of children, largely stemming from a higher likelihood of a first birth among the more socioeconomically advantaged men. The educational gradient in the number of children was not explained by early socioeconomic or other characteristics shared by brothers, but occupational position and income in adulthood mediated approximately half of the association. Parity-specific differences existed: education and many other socioeconomic characteristics predicted the likelihood of a first birth more strongly than that of a second birth, and the mediating role of occupational position and income was also strongest for first births. Relatively small differences were found in the likelihood of a third birth. In men, education is positively associated with eventual fertility after controlling for early socioeconomic and other characteristics shared by brothers. Selective entry into fatherhood based on economic provider potential may contribute considerably to educational differentials in the number of children among men.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 366
页数:29
相关论文
共 207 条
[11]  
Balbo N(1983)Supply-side sociology of the family: The challenge of the new home economics Annual Review of Sociology 9 375-395
[12]  
Billari FC(2014)Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions and behaviour: A life course perspective Advances in Life Course Research 21 10-27
[13]  
Mills M(2011)Social age deadlines for the childbearing of women and men Human Reproduction 26 616-622
[14]  
Barthold JA(2005)Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility Annual Review of Sociology 31 223-243
[15]  
Myrskylä M(2009)Higher-order fertility among urban fathers: An overlooked issue for a neglected population Journal of Family Issues 30 968-1000
[16]  
Jones OR(2015)Social background and becoming a parent in Sweden: A register-based study of the effect of social background on childbearing in Sweden European Journal of Population 31 417-444
[17]  
Bartus T(2007)Educational homogamy in 22 European countries European Societies 9 495-526
[18]  
Murinkó L(2009)Education, work and parenthood: Comparing the experience of young men and women in Sweden Journal of Family and Economic Issues 30 32-42
[19]  
Szalma I(2006)Gender equality and fertility in Sweden: A study on the impact of the father’s uptake of parental leave on continued childbearing Marriage & Family Review 39 121-142
[20]  
Szél B(2010)Family policy and fertility: Fathers’ and mothers’ use of parental leave and continued childbearing in Norway and Sweden Journal of European Social Policy 20 45-57