Health-related quality of life on tele-monitoring for users with pacemakers 6 months after implant: the NORDLAND study, a randomized trial

[1] Epstein AE(2008)ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J Am Coll Cardiol 51 e1-62

[2] JP DM(2008)HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations Heart Rhythm 5 907-925

[3] Ellenbogen KA(2012)Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implanted electronic devices: a paradigm shift for the 21st century Expert Rev Med Devices 9 367-376

[4] Wilkoff BL(2012)In-home controls of pacemakers in debilitated elderly patients Geriatr Gerontol Int 12 30-35

[5] Auricchio A(2013)Remote follow-up of pacemakers in a selected population of debilitated elderly patients Europace 15 382-387

[6] Brugada J(2016)Workload, time and costs of the informal cares in patients with tele-monitoring of pacemakers. The PONIENTE study Clin Res Cardiol 105 307-313

[7] Cronin E(2013)Socio-economic effects and cost saving potential of remote patient monitoring (SAVE-HM trial) Int J Cardiol 169 402-407

[8] Varma N(2013)Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? Eur Heart J 34 1885-1895

[9] Folino AF(2009)Technical reliability and clinical safety of a remote monitoring system for antiarrhythmic cardiac devices Rev Esp Cardiol 62 886-895

[10] Breda R(2015)Comparative effectiveness of remote monitoring of people with cardiac pacemaker versus conventional: quality of life at the 6 months Rev Esp Salud Pública 89 149-158

[1] Epstein AE(2008)ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J Am Coll Cardiol 51 e1-62

[2] JP DM(2008)HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations Heart Rhythm 5 907-925

[3] Ellenbogen KA(2012)Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implanted electronic devices: a paradigm shift for the 21st century Expert Rev Med Devices 9 367-376

[4] Wilkoff BL(2012)In-home controls of pacemakers in debilitated elderly patients Geriatr Gerontol Int 12 30-35

[5] Auricchio A(2013)Remote follow-up of pacemakers in a selected population of debilitated elderly patients Europace 15 382-387

[6] Brugada J(2016)Workload, time and costs of the informal cares in patients with tele-monitoring of pacemakers. The PONIENTE study Clin Res Cardiol 105 307-313

[7] Cronin E(2013)Socio-economic effects and cost saving potential of remote patient monitoring (SAVE-HM trial) Int J Cardiol 169 402-407

[8] Varma N(2013)Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? Eur Heart J 34 1885-1895

[9] Folino AF(2009)Technical reliability and clinical safety of a remote monitoring system for antiarrhythmic cardiac devices Rev Esp Cardiol 62 886-895

[10] Breda R(2015)Comparative effectiveness of remote monitoring of people with cardiac pacemaker versus conventional: quality of life at the 6 months Rev Esp Salud Pública 89 149-158