How digitalization and financial development impact eco-efficiency? Evidence from China

被引:0
作者
Jiujiu Cui
Wenju Wang
Zhenling Chen
Guangqian Ren
Xiaofang Gao
机构
[1] Xinxiang University,School of Management
[2] Beijing Wuzi University,Institute for Carbon Peak and Neutrality & School of Economics
[3] Beijing Technology and Business University,School of Economics
[4] Zhengzhou University,Business School
[5] North China Power Engineering Co.,Contract Pricing Department
[6] Ltd. of China Power Engineering Consulting Group,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
Financial Development; Digitalization; Eco-efficiency; Panel threshold model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The rapid growth of industrial digitalization and financial support are the main driving forces for the green transformation of China’s economy. Aiming to explore how digitalization and financial development impact ecological efficiency (eco-efficiency), this study proposes a unified research framework by integrating multiple technologies using the panel data that covered 30 China’s provinces from 2006 to 2018. First, China’s provincial digital development index is constructed to measure the level of digitalization, and regional eco-efficiency is estimated by a non-radial data envelope analysis (DEA) model. Based on that, the panel data regression model and panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model are used to explore the direct effects and dynamic effect of digitalization and financial development on eco-efficiency, respectively. Then, the threshold regression model is employed to check the threshold effect of the two variables on eco-efficiency. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) Both digitalization and financial development have a significantly positive correlation with regional eco-efficiency, indicating that China’s digitalization and financial development in recent years have both improved regional eco-efficiency. (2) Eco-efficiency has positive and longer responses to the impulse coming from digitalization and financial development, and the response of ecological efficiency to financial development is greater than its response to digitalization. (3) Threshold effects exist in the impact mechanism of digitalization on regional eco-efficiency. This indicates that the level of financial support is too low to promote the improvement in ecological efficiency. Eco-efficiency can be improved only to a certain extent. The research conclusions provide a policy reference for improving eco-efficiency and promoting China’s green development.
引用
收藏
页码:3847 / 3861
页数:14
相关论文
共 172 条
  • [1] Agrawal DR(2021)The internet as a tax haven? Am Econ J Econ Pol 13 1-35
  • [2] An S(2021)Green credit financing versus trade credit financing in a supply chain with carbon emission limits Eur J Oper Res 292 125-142
  • [3] Li B(2019)Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis Renewable Energy 139 198-213
  • [4] Song D(2022)Improving eco-efficiency in coal mining area for sustainability development: an emergy and super-efficiency SBM-DEA with undesirable output J Clean Prod 339 130701-273
  • [5] Chen X(2021)Does green investment improve energy firm performance? Energy Policy 153 112252-1867
  • [6] Charfeddine L(2020)Environmental sustainability of digitalization in manufacturing: a review Sustainability 12 10298-248
  • [7] Kahia M(2021)Measuring green total factor productivity of China's agricultural sector: a three-stage SBM-DEA model with non-point source pollution and CO2 emissions J Clean Prod 318 128543-590
  • [8] Chen YF(2020)Assessing the eco-efficiency of US manufacturing industries with a focus on renewable vs non-renewable energy use: an integrated time series MRIO and DEA approach J Clean Prod 253 119630-424
  • [9] Liu LS(2013)Assessment of the public administration tools for the improvement of the eco-efficiency of small and medium sized enterprises J Clean Prod 47 265-31
  • [10] Chen YF(2008)Japanese banking inefficiency and shadow pricing Math Comput Model 48 1854-275