A phase I/II study of 4 monthly courses of high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa for metastatic breast cancer patients

被引:0
作者
T Bachelot
F Gomez
P Biron
I Ray-Coquard
P Soler-Michel
I Philip
J P Guastalla
P Rebattu
A Dumortier
J P Droz
J Y Blay
机构
[1] Département de Cancérologie Médicale Centre Léon Bérard,
[2] Unité de Biostatistiques,undefined
[3] Centre Léon Bérard,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2002年 / 87卷
关键词
filgrastim; haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; breast neoplasms; chemotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This pilot phase I/II study intended to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa administered on four consecutive courses with peripheral blood progenitor cell and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support, as first-line therapy for hormone-refractory metastatic breast cancer patients. Twenty-eight patients were entered in the study. After two courses of epirubicin (120 mg m−2) and cyclophosphamide (2 g m−2) followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor injection and leukaphereses, patients received four cycles of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. Each cycle was followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor supports, then repeated every 28 to 35 days. Six escalating dose levels of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa were planned, beginning at cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m−2 and thiotepa 200 mg m−2. At least three patients were enrolled for each dose level. Eighteen patients completed the study. The maximum tolerated dose was 3000 mg m−2 cyclophosphamide and 400 mg m−2 thiotepa per course. Haematological toxicity was manageable on an outpatient basis and did not increase significantly with dose escalation. Dose-limiting toxicity was chemotherapy-induced immuno-suppression, which resulted in one toxic death and two life-threatening infections. Median times to treatment failure and survival were 11 and 26 months, respectively. Three patients were alive, free of disease 30 months after completion of the study. Such therapy allows for high-dose intensity and high cumulative doses on a short period of time with manageable toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1085
页数:6
相关论文
共 208 条
[1]  
Antman KH(2001)A critique of the eleven randomised trials of high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer Eur J Cancer 37 173-179
[2]  
Basser RL(1995)Adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer using multicycle high-dose chemotherapy and filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells Clin Cancer Res 1 715-721
[3]  
To LB(1998)A risk model for thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion after cytotoxic chemotherapy Blood 92 405-410
[4]  
Begley CG(1993)Breast cancer: chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced disease Eur J Cancer 29A 598-604
[5]  
Juttner CA(1988)Cyclophosphamide and thiotepa with autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with solid tumors J Natl Cancer Inst 80 1221-1226
[6]  
Maher DW(1990)A phase I-II study of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with autologous bone marrow transplantation in solid tumor patients J Clin Oncol 8 1239-1245
[7]  
Szer J(1999)Deficient cellular immunity–finding and fixing the defects Science 285 546-551
[8]  
Cebon J(1997)Peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation for solid tumors and lymphomas: hematologic recovery and costs. A randomized, controlled trial Ann Intern Med 126 600-607
[9]  
Collins JP(1984)The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer J Clin Oncol 2 1281-1288
[10]  
Russell I(2000)Reduction of cyclophosphamide bioactivation by thioTEPA: critical sequence-dependency in high-dose chemotherapy regimens Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 46 119-127