India and ‘European’ evolutionary political economy

被引：0
作者：
Srinivas S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Economics Department and Development Policy and Practice Group, Open University, Milton Keynes
[2] Innogen Institute, Open University and University of Edinburgh, Milton Keynes
[3] Department of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Public Policy (STEaPP), University College London (UCL), London
来源：
Review of Evolutionary Political Economy | 2023年 / 4卷 / 2期
关键词：
B40; B52; D02; Economic development; Evolutionary political economy; India; Institutional variety; Institutions; N00; O1; P51; Technological capabilities;
D O I：
10.1007/s43253-023-00105-x
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Evolutionary political economy (EPE) deals with populations and economic change over time but has not been systematised beyond European industrial history. The world’s largest democracy India, despite challenges from COVID-19, is now the fastest growing and 5th largest economy in the world, transitioning into a distinct period of industrial deepening, with export expansion in engineering products and services, huge outlays on airports, highways and rail systems, new domestic defence initiatives to boost indigenous R&D, yet retains a global diplomatic stance as a responsible nation–state from vaccine sharing to Asian security. This commentary explores the Indian case to argue that EPE’s combinatorial approach to technological capabilities and industrial development can be considerably strengthened from the study of non-European cases. © The Author(s) 2023.
引用
收藏
页码：415 / 443
页数：28
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Abramovitz M., Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind, J Econ Hist, 46, 2, pp. 385-406, (1986)
[2]  
Adkisson R.V., The original institutionalist perspective on economy and its place in a pluralist paradigm, Int J Plur Econ Educ, 1, 4, pp. 356-371, (2010)
[3]  
Almeida F., Goulart G., Recontextualizing Clarence Ayres’s The theory of economic progress through archival evidence, J Econ Issues, 54, 2, pp. 392-397, (2020)
[4]  
Amable B., Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production, Review of International Political Economy, 7, 4, pp. 645-687, (2000)
[5]  
Amsden H.A., Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization., (1989)
[6]  
Arthur Lewis W., Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour, Vol XXII. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, pp. 139-191, (1954)
[7]  
Ayres C.E., The industrial economy, (1952)
[8]  
Backhouse R.E., A suggestion for clarifying the study of dissent in economics, Journal of the History of Economics Thought, 26, 2, pp. 261-271, (2004)
[9]  
Chang H.-J., Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective, (2002)
[10]  
Elsner W., The theory of institutional change revisited: the institutional dichotomy, its dynamic, and its policy implications in a more formal analysis, J Econ Issues, 46, 1, pp. 1-44, (2012)
123456