What we remember affects how we see: Spatial working memory steers saccade programming

被引:0
|
作者
Jason H. Wong
Matthew S. Peterson
机构
[1] George Mason University,Department of Psychology
[2] Naval Undersea Warfare Center,undefined
来源
关键词
Attention and memory; Eye movements and visual attention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Relationships between visual attention, saccade programming, and visual working memory have been hypothesized for over a decade. Awh, Jonides, and Reuter-Lorenz (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24(3):780–90, 1998) and Awh et al. (Psychological Science 10(5):433–437, 1999) proposed that rehearsing a location in memory also leads to enhanced attentional processing at that location. In regard to eye movements, Belopolsky and Theeuwes (Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 71(3):620–631, 2009) found that holding a location in working memory affects saccade programming, albeit negatively. In three experiments, we attempted to replicate the findings of Belopolsky and Theeuwes (Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 71(3):620–631, 2009) and determine whether the spatial memory effect can occur in other saccade-cuing paradigms, including endogenous central arrow cues and exogenous irrelevant singletons. In the first experiment, our results were the opposite of those in Belopolsky and Theeuwes (Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 71(3):620–631, 2009), in that we found facilitation (shorter saccade latencies) instead of inhibition when the saccade target matched the region in spatial working memory. In Experiment 2, we sought to determine whether the spatial working memory effect would generalize to other endogenous cuing tasks, such as a central arrow that pointed to one of six possible peripheral locations. As in Experiment 1, we found that saccade programming was facilitated when the cued location coincided with the saccade target. In Experiment 3, we explored how spatial memory interacts with other types of cues, such as a peripheral color singleton target or irrelevant onset. In both cases, the eyes were more likely to go to either singleton when it coincided with the location held in spatial working memory. On the basis of these results, we conclude that spatial working memory and saccade programming are likely to share common overlapping circuitry.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 321
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Memory Thief and the Secrets Behind How We Remember
    Bennett, Mason
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 86 (03) : 207 - 208
  • [32] How We Remember Brain Mechanisms of Episodic Memory
    Colgin, Laura Lee
    SCIENCE, 2012, 336 (6082) : 671 - 671
  • [33] From Where and How to What We See
    Karthikeyan, S.
    Jagadeesh, Vignesh
    Shenoy, Renuka
    Eckstein, Miguel
    Manjunath, B. S.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION (ICCV), 2013, : 625 - 632
  • [34] How the brain decides what we see
    Smythies, J
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2005, 98 (01) : 18 - 20
  • [35] Visual intelligence: How we create what we see.
    Hensley, K
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1998, 123 (20) : 150 - 150
  • [36] What we see is how we are: New paradigms in visual research
    Maldonado A, Pedro
    BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 40 (04) : 439 - 450
  • [37] How What We See and What We Know Influence Iconic Gesture Production
    Ingrid Masson-Carro
    Martijn Goudbeek
    Emiel Krahmer
    Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 2017, 41 : 367 - 394
  • [38] How What We See and What We Know Influence Iconic Gesture Production
    Masson-Carro, Ingrid
    Goudbeek, Martijn
    Krahmer, Emiel
    JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2017, 41 (04) : 367 - 394
  • [39] What We Remember. The construction of memory in military discourse
    Venken, Machteld
    PRAGMATICS, 2008, 18 (04): : 814 - 815
  • [40] How we categorize objects is related to how we remember them: The shape bias as a memory bias
    Vlach, Haley A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 152 : 12 - 30