Artificial neural networks and fuzzy time series forecasting: an application to air quality

被引:0
作者
Nur Haizum Abd Rahman
Muhammad Hisyam Lee
Mohd Talib Suhartono
机构
[1] Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science
[2] Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember,Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
[3] Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology
来源
Quality & Quantity | 2015年 / 49卷
关键词
Artificial neural network; Air Pollution Index (API); Time series; Forecasting; Fuzzy time series; ARIMA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The arising air pollution has addressed much attention globally due to its detrimental effects on human health and environment. As an early warning system for air quality control and management, it is important to provide precise information about the future concentrations in pollutants. We present here a time series model in predicting the Air Pollution Index (API) from three different stations; industrial, residential, and sub-urban areas between 2000 and 2009. In this paper, the Box–Jenkins approach of seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), artificial neural network (ANN), and three models of fuzzy time series (FTS) have been compared by using the mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute error, mean square error, and root mean square error. Although all the methods were used as operational tools, the ANN seemed more accurate in forecasting API. The results showed that FTS (i.e. Chen’s, Yu’s, and Cheng’s) performed inconsistent results since the conventional methods of ARIMA outperformed the performance of FTS. However, consistent results were achieved as the ANNs gave the smallest forecasting error compared to FTS and ARIMA.
引用
收藏
页码:2633 / 2647
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Afroz R(2003)Review of air pollution and health impacts in Malaysia Environ. Res. 92 71-77
  • [2] Hassan MN(1992)Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: empirical comparisons Int. J. Forecast. 8 69-80
  • [3] Ibrahim NA(2006)F.: Fuzzy approaches to environmental decisions: application to air quality Environ. Sci. Policy 9 22-31
  • [4] Armstrong JS(2003)Fuzzy environmental decision-making: applications to air pollution Atmos. Environ. 37 1865-1877
  • [5] Collopy F(2009)A simple feedforward neural network for the PM10 forecasting: comparison with a radial basis function network and a multivariate linear regression model Water Air Soil Pollut. 201 365-377
  • [6] Bernard EA(2002)Forecasting enrollments based on high-order fuzzy time series Cybern. Syst. 33 1-16
  • [7] Bernard F(2008)Fuzzy time-series based on adaptive expectation model for TAIEX forecasting Expert Syst. Appl. 34 1126-1132
  • [8] Caselli M(1998)Time series forecasting with neural networks: a comparative study using the air line data J. R. Stat. Soc.: Series C 47 231-250
  • [9] Trizio L(2009)Statistical models and time series forecasting of sulfur dioxide: a case study Tehran Environ. Monit. Assess. 155 149-155
  • [10] Gennaro Gd(2004)A new method of ozone forecasting using fuzzy expert and neural network systems Sci. Total Environ. 325 221-237