A legal perspective on university technology transfer

被引:0
作者
Christopher S. Hayter
Jacob H. Rooksby
机构
[1] Arizona State University,Center for Organization Research and Design, School of Public Affairs
[2] Duquesne University,School of Law
来源
The Journal of Technology Transfer | 2016年 / 41卷
关键词
Technology transfer; Bayh–Dole; Law; Patents; Legal research; O32; O34; O38;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the thirty-five years after passage of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980, a robust literature has documented the emergence of university technology transfer as a critical mechanism for the dissemination and commercialization of new technology stemming from federally-funded research. Missing from these investigations, however, is what this paper terms the legal perspective, an understanding of how the law and its attendant mechanisms impact university technology transfer. Specifically, the paper reviews the extant legal scholarship and provides examples of how case law, legal structures, and the unique nature of intellectual property law affects technology transfer, as well as higher education policy and management. Throughout, we propose critical questions for future investigation, which serve to form a cross-disciplinary research agenda that can contribute fresh insights to scholarly and policy discussions related to the role of universities in economic and social development.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 289
页数:19
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Ács ZJ(2009)The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship Small Business Economics 32 15-30
[2]  
Braunerhjelm P(2006)Academic discourse and proprietary rights: Putting patents in their proper place Boston College Law Review 47 217-274
[3]  
Audretsch DB(1996)From “publish to perish” to “profit or perish”: Revenues from university technology transfer and the 501(c)(3) tax exemption University of Pennsylvania Law Review 145 89-147
[4]  
Carlsson B(2013)Models and methods of university technology transfer Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 9 571-650
[5]  
Bagley M(2008)Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo Research Policy 37 1175-1187
[6]  
Blumberg P(2010)Unveiling the distinction between the university and its academic researchers: Lessons for patent infringement and university technology transfer Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 12 473-514
[7]  
Bradley S(2014)Beyond Einstein and Edison: Claiming space for non-faculty inventors in technology transfer Indiana Law Review 47 645-688
[8]  
Hayter CS(1992)Faculty generated inventions: Who owns the golden egg? Law Review 1992 259-312
[9]  
Link AN(2004)Patents and appropriation: Concerns and evidence Journal of Technology Transfer 30 57-71
[10]  
Bramwell A(2010)The NCAA, tax exemption, and college athletics University of Illinois Law Review 2010 109-163