Validity evidence of two short scales measuring the Big Five personality factors

被引:0
作者
Jacob Arie Laros
Alexandre José de Souza Peres
Josemberg Moura de Andrade
Maria Fabiana Damásio Passos
机构
[1] Universidade de Brasília,Instituto de Psicologia, Departamento de Psicologia Social e do Trabalho
[2] Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro,Instituto de Psicologia, Departamento de Psicologia Social e do Trabalho
[3] Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS),Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
[4] Campus de Paranaíba,undefined
[5] Universidade de Brasília,undefined
[6] Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro,undefined
[7] Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro - Gleba A,undefined
来源
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica | / 31卷
关键词
Convergent validity; Big Five personality factors; Reduced scales;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study was to obtain evidence of the convergent and factor validity of the Reduced Scale of Big Five Personality Factors (ER5FP), with 20 items, and of the Reduced Inventory of Big Five Personality Factors (IGFP-5R), with 32 items. The two Brazilian scales were administered to 554 participants aged 16–69 years (M = 30.6, SD = 8.6). The measurement model of each instrument was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Both scales showed an adequate adjustment of the measurement model to the data (root mean square error of approximation < .06; standardized root mean square residual < .06) after excluding a number of items. Correlations between the factors of both instruments were estimated. Moderate evidence of convergent validity was found for Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience (raw correlations ranging from .44 and .57, and disattenuated correlations from .60 to .80). For Agreeableness and Conscientiousness, weaker evidence was found (raw correlations of .33 and .29, and disattenuated correlations of .48 and .43, respectively).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Benet-Martinez V(1998)Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 729-750
[2]  
John OP(2016)For better or for worse: the moderating effects of personality on the marriage-life satisfaction link Personality and Individual Differences 97 61-66
[3]  
Boyce CJ(2012)Evidências desfavoráveis para avaliação da personalidade com um instrumento de 10 itens Paidéia 22 63-71
[4]  
Wood AM(2012)An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 102 874-888
[5]  
Ferguson E(2010)Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98 160-173
[6]  
Carvalho L d F(2008)Age differences in the Big Five across the life span: evidence from two national samples Psychology and Aging 23 558-562
[7]  
Nunes MFO(2006)The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality Psychological Assessment 18 192-203
[8]  
Primi R(2006)Psychometric adequacy and comparability of the short and full forms of the Personality Assessment Inventory Psychological Assessment 18 324-333
[9]  
Nunes CHS d S(1992)The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure Psychological Assessment 4 26-42
[10]  
Credé M(2012)Relações hierárquicas entre os traços amplos do Big Five Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 25 445-456