Convergent Validity of the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale for Youth in Community Mental Health Settings

被引:0
作者
Matthew C. Lambert
Stacy-Ann A. January
Michael H. Epstein
Mary Spooner
Tesfayi Gebreselassie
Robert L. Stephens
机构
[1] University of Nebraska–Lincoln,Special Education and Communication Disorders
[2] ICF International,undefined
来源
Journal of Child and Family Studies | 2015年 / 24卷
关键词
Behavioral strengths; Strength-based assessment; Rating scales; Community mental health; Convergent validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditionally, assessment of youths’ emotional and behavioral functioning within community mental health is conducted from a deficit-based approach, often excluding the measurement of strengths. Assessing youths’ emotional and behavioral strengths can provide a comprehensive understanding of youths’ functioning and better inform treatment planning. The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale-Second Edition (BERS-2) is a standardized, norm-referenced assessment of the behavioral and emotional strengths of youth ages 5–18. The psychometric properties of the BERS-2 scores are well established; however, most previous studies have focused on youth within school settings. As such, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the convergent validity of the scores from the caregiver version of the BERS-2 with a large, diverse sample of youth referred for community mental health services. The correlation coefficients between the BERS-2 scores and scores from the Child Behavior Checklist and the Columbia Impairment Scale were moderate to large, and in the expected directions. Thus, findings support the convergent validity and use of the BERS-2 scores for youth receiving community mental health services.
引用
收藏
页码:3827 / 3832
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Benner GJ(2008)Convergent validity with the BERS-2 teacher Rating Scale and the Achenbach teacher’s report form: A replication and extension Journal of Child and Family Studies 17 427-436
[2]  
Beaudoin K(1996)Global measures of impairment for epidemiologic and clinical use with children and adolescents International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 6 295-307
[3]  
Mooney P(1993)The Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS): Pilot findings on a measure of global impairment for children and adolescents International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 3 167-176
[4]  
Uhing BM(2014)Convergent validity of the strength-based behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale with youth in a residential setting The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 20 258-263
[5]  
Pierce CD(1999)The development and validation of a scale to assess the emotional and behavioral strengths of children and adolescents Remedial and Special Education 38 581-586
[6]  
Bird HR(1997)The strengths and difficulties Questionnaire: A research note Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 20 529-540
[7]  
Andrews H(2011)Development and validation of a parent report measure for assessing social-emotional competencies of children and adolescents Journal of Child and Family Studies 50 741-749
[8]  
Schwab-Stone M(1995)Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning American Psychologist 27 147-155
[9]  
Goodman S(2005)Reliability and validity of the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale-Second Edition: Parent Rating Scale Children and Schools 36 230-237
[10]  
Dulcan M(2005)Assessing strengths, resilience, and growth to guide clinical interventions Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 6 1-8