Quality assurance for diffusion tensor imaging using an ACR phantom: Comparative analysis with 6, 15, and 32 directions at 1.5T and 3.0T MRI systems

被引:0
|
作者
Jung-Hoon Lee
Sang-Young Kim
Do-Wan Lee
Jin-Young Jung
Kyu-Ho Song
Bo-Young Choe
机构
[1] College of Medicine,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering
[2] The Catholic University of Korea,Department of Radiology
[3] Kyunghee Medical Center,undefined
来源
Journal of the Korean Physical Society | 2014年 / 65卷
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion tensor imaging; ACR MRI phantom;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been widely used for the quantitative analyses of the integrity of white matter in the brain in clinical and research fields, quality assurance (QA) for DTI has not been fully established. Thus, we suggest a QA guideline for DTI using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) head phantom. In this study, the geometric accuracy, slice-position accuracy, image intensity uniformity, percent signalghosting, low-contrast object detectability, image distortion, fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured and evaluated in 1.5T and 3.0T MRI scanners equipped with an 8-channel SENSE head coil. The standard axial spin echo (SE) T1-weighted MR images and DTI with 6, 15 and 32 directions were obtained. Concerning geometric accuracy, image twisting in the three directions was observed due to the inhomogeneity of echo planar imaging (EPI). Image intensity uniformity was significantly lower for DTI than for the standard SE T1-weighted MR images. Percent signal ghosting was higher for images from 3.0T MRI than for images from 1.5T MRI. Low-contrast object detectability was visually identified and measured at a low contrasttonoise ratio (CNR) and a low signaltonoise ratio (SNR). Image distortion changed remarkably to the phaseencoding direction. The present study using the ACR MRI phantom suggests a QA method for DTI with high reproducibility and easy accessibility.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Quality assurance for diffusion tensor imaging using an ACR phantom: Comparative analysis with 6, 15, and 32 directions at 1.5T and 3.0T MRI systems
    Lee, Jung-Hoon
    Kim, Sang-Young
    Lee, Do-Wan
    Jung, Jin-Young
    Song, Kyu-Ho
    Choe, Bo-Young
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [2] Evaluation of the ACR MRI phantom for quality assurance tests of 1.5 T MRI scanners in Estonian hospitals
    Kaljuste, Doris
    Nigul, Mait
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ESTONIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2014, 63 (03) : 240 - 246
  • [3] Detection of parametrial invasion in women with uterine cervical cancer using diffusion tensor imaging at 1.5T MRI
    Di Paola, Valerio
    Perillo, Federica
    Gui, Benedetta
    Russo, Luca
    Pierconti, Francesco
    Fiorentino, Vincenzo
    Autorino, Rosa
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Manfredi, Riccardo
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (10) : 472 - 478
  • [4] Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of rodent brains in vivo using a 1.5T clinical MR scanner
    Lee, FKH
    Fang, MR
    Antonio, GE
    Yeung, DKW
    Chan, ETY
    Zhang, LH
    Yew, DT
    Ahuja, AT
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (05) : 747 - 751
  • [5] Feasibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging at 1.5T Using Multi-Band Echo Planar Acquisition
    Mitsuda, Minoru
    Suzuki, Yuichi
    Kunimatsu, Akira
    Kasahara, Akihiro
    Watanabe, Yasushi
    Ino, Kenji
    Yano, Keiichi
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 16 (02) : 169 - 175
  • [6] Diffusion tensor imaging characterization of occult brain damage in relapsing neuromyelitis optica using 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging techniques
    Zhao, Dai-Di
    Zhou, Hong-Yu
    Wu, Qi-Zhu
    Liu, Ju
    Chen, Xiu-Ying
    He, Dian
    He, Xiao-Fei
    Han, Wen-Jie
    Gong, Qi-Yong
    NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 59 (04) : 3173 - 3177
  • [7] Track density imaging using diffusion tensor imaging data from 1.5 T MRI scanner
    Kosker, Fatma Betul
    Gumus, Kazim Ziya
    Tokmakci, Mahmut
    Acer, Niyazi
    Senol, Serkan
    Bilgen, Mehmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2022, 30 (06) : 2044 - 2053
  • [8] Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity: comparison between 3.0-T and 1.5-T diffusion tensor imaging with parallel imaging using histogram and region of interest analysis
    Fushimi, Yasutaka
    Miki, Yukio
    Okada, Tsutomu
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Mori, Nobuyuki
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    Urayama, Shin-ichi
    Aso, Toshihiko
    Fukuyama, Hidenao
    Kikuta, Ken-ichiro
    Togashi, Kaori
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2007, 20 (08) : 743 - 748
  • [9] Machine learning classificatory as a tool in the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using diffusion tensor imaging parameters collected with 1.5T MRI scanner: A case study
    Jamrozy, Milosz
    Maj, Edyta
    Bielecki, Maksymilian
    Bartoszek, Marta
    Golebiowski, Marek
    Kuzma-Kozakiewicz, Magdalena
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2023, 20 (06):
  • [10] Image Quality and Focal Lesion Detectability Analysis of Multiband Variable-Rate Selective Excitation Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Liver Using 3.0-T MRI
    Yoon, Ja Kyung
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Kim, Eunju
    Seo, Nieun
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    INVESTIGATIVE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 28 (01) : 8 - 17