Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial

被引:11
作者
Coronado, Gloria D. [1 ]
Leo, Michael C. [1 ]
Ramsey, Katrina [2 ,3 ]
Coury, Jennifer [2 ]
Petrik, Amanda F. [1 ]
Patzel, Mary [2 ]
Kenzie, Erin S. [2 ]
Thompson, Jamie H. [1 ]
Brodt, Erik [4 ]
Mummadi, Raj [1 ]
Elder, Nancy [2 ,4 ]
Davis, Melinda M. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227 USA
[2] Oregon Rural Practice Based Res Network, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L222, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] OHSU, Biostat & Design Program, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code CB669, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[4] OHSU, Sch Med, OHSU Family Med, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L222, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[5] OHSU PSU, Sch Publ Hlth, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd,Mail Code L222, Portland, OR 97239 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Medicaid; Colorectal cancer screening; Mailed FIT outreach; Fecal test; Fecal immunochemical test (FIT); Follow-up colonoscopy; Implementation science; Rural; Primary care; BOOT CAMP TRANSLATION; COLON-CANCER; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PRACTICE FACILITATORS; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; DISPARITIES; INTERVENTIONS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-022-00285-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundScreening reduces incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet US screening rates are low, particularly among Medicaid enrollees in rural communities. We describe a two-phase project, SMARTER CRC, designed to achieve the National Cancer Institute Cancer MoonshotSM objectives by reducing the burden of CRC on the US population. Specifically, SMARTER CRC aims to test the implementation, effectiveness, and maintenance of a mailed fecal test and patient navigation program to improve rates of CRC screening, follow-up colonoscopy, and referral to care in clinics serving rural Medicaid enrollees.MethodsPhase I activities in SMARTER CRC include a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mailed fecal test and patient navigation program involving three Medicaid health plans and 30 rural primary care practices in Oregon and Idaho; the implementation of the program is supported by training and practice facilitation. Participating clinic units were randomized 1:1 into the intervention or usual care. The intervention combines (1) mailed fecal testing outreach supported by clinics, health plans, and vendors and (2) patient navigation for colonoscopy following an abnormal fecal test result. We will evaluate the effectiveness, implementation, and maintenance of the intervention and track adaptations to the intervention and to implementation strategies, using quantitative and qualitative methods. Our primary effectiveness outcome is receipt of any CRC screening within 6 months of enrollee identification. Our primary implementation outcome is health plan- and clinic-level rates of program delivery, by component (mailed FIT and patient navigation). Trial results will inform phase II activities to scale up the program through partnerships with health plans, primary care clinics, and regional and national organizations that serve rural primary care clinics; scale-up will include webinars, train-the-trainer workshops, and collaborative learning activities.DiscussionThis study will test the implementation, effectiveness, and scale-up of a multi-component mailed fecal testing and patient navigation program to improve CRC screening rates in rural Medicaid enrollees. Our findings may inform approaches for adapting and scaling evidence-based approaches to promote CRC screening participation in underserved populations and settings.Trial registrationRegistered at clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI's Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP #: NCI-2021-01032) on May 11, 2021.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Allison PD., 2012, Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. in SAS global forum
[2]  
American Cancer Society, 2018, Oregon Cancer Statistics at a glance
[3]   To Screen or Not to Screen Adults 45-49 Years of Age: That is the Question [J].
Anderson, Joseph C. ;
Samadder, N. Jewel .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (12) :1750-1753
[4]   Risk Factors for Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer at a Late Stage: a Population-Based Study [J].
Andrew, Angeline S. ;
Parker, Siddhartha ;
Anderson, Joseph C. ;
Rees, Judy R. ;
Robinson, Christina ;
Riddle, Bruce ;
Butterly, Lynn F. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (12) :2100-2105
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, J Cancer Ther, DOI DOI 10.4236/JCT.2014.513124
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Rural-urban commuting area codes
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Practice facilitation handbook: Approaches to quality improvement
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, COLORECTAL CANC FACT
[9]   Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Practice Facilitation Within Primary Care Settings [J].
Baskerville, N. Bruce ;
Liddy, Clare ;
Hogg, William .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 10 (01) :63-74
[10]  
Blake KD, 2017, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V26, P992, DOI [10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092, 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-17-0092]