Teachers Using Dialogue to Support Science Learning in the Primary Classroom

被引:0
作者
Ann France
机构
[1] Monash University,
来源
Research in Science Education | 2021年 / 51卷
关键词
Dialogue; Science; Primary teachers; High-level thinking;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The importance of using dialogue as a pedagogical tool to enhance student learning in science has been widely recognised in research literature. Effective classroom dialogue is dependent upon teaching which successfully engages students in critical thinking and deep learning, requiring many teachers to think and work differently in science education. To understand the implications of such pedagogy for teaching practice, it is vital to determine how teachers presently consider and enact the role of dialogue in their science teaching. The study discussed in this paper examines how four primary teachers think about and use dialogue to develop scientific thinking and understanding in their primary classrooms. The study was conducted with teachers working in an inner city, primary school in Melbourne, Australia. Data sets included in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted with the participant teachers, along with three classroom observation sessions recorded with small groups in each participant teacher’s classroom. A talk analysis framework, informed by existing literature, was developed and applied to the classroom observation data. Key findings emerged which identified the teacher as critical to the development of effective dialogue, determining the degree of time provided for dialogue, the nature of the interactions taking place and the questioning used to both promote student reasoning and also challenge student thinking. The analysis also raises considerations about appropriate expectations of higher level thinking in any given dialogue and supports a position which sees worthwhile value for students in building teacher knowledge and capacity to enact effective dialogue in science.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 859
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Barnes D(2010)Why talk is important English Teaching: Practice and Critique 9 7-10
[2]  
de Boer GE(2000)Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 582-601
[3]  
Dickinson DK(2011)Relation between language experiences in preschool classrooms and children’s kindergarten and fourth-grade language and reading abilities Child Development 82 870-886
[4]  
Porche MV(2015)The role of the teacher in promoting dialogue and polylogue during inquiry activities in primary education Mind, Culture, and Activity 22 326-341
[5]  
Dobber M(2012)Talking to learn: focusing teacher education on dialogue as a core practice for teaching and learning Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37 6-215
[6]  
van Oers B(2003)Boys’ and girls’ use of linguistic space in small-group discussions: whose talk dominates? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 26 28-180
[7]  
Edwards-Groves C(2003)Interactive whole-class teaching in the National Literacy Strategy Cambridge Journal of Education 33 197-23
[8]  
Hoare RL(2005)Thinking together at key stage 1 Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development 25 165-445
[9]  
Godinho S(2016)Education and the social brain: linking language, thinking, teaching and learning Éducation et didactique 10 9-369
[10]  
Shrimpton B(2014)The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970’s until the 2010’s Oxford Review of Education 40 430-198