Analytical investigation on cyclic response of buckling-restrained braces with short yielding core segments

被引:1
作者
Muhamed Safeer Pandikkadavath
Dipti Ranjan Sahoo
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Delhi,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
International Journal of Steel Structures | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Braced frames; Buckling-restrained braces; Drift response; Finite element analysis; Seismic analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Buckling-restrained braced frames (BRBFs) are considered to be one of the efficient lateral force-resisting systems used in buildings located in the seismically active regions. Nearly symmetric hysteretic response of buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) in tension and compression due to the yielding of steel core plates helps the BRBFs to withstand the seismic excitations without causing any extensive damage to the primary frame members. However, BRBFs may exhibit the excessive post-earthquake residual drift response due to the low axial stiffness of BRBs under the strong ground motions. A reduction in the yielding core segments of BRBs results in the improved elastic and post-elastic axial stiffness of BRBs which may help in controlling the excessive residual drift response. This study is focussed on the analytical evaluation of hysteretic response of BRBs of varying lengths using finite element (FE) software. The results of FE study are further used to evaluate the inter-story and residual drift response of a 3-story braced frame fitted with BRBs of short core lengths (referred as SBRBF). Nonlinear dynamic analysis results of SBRBF are compared with the conventional BRBF and concentrically braced frame (CBF). It is concluded that the optimum reduction in yielding core lengths of BRBs can improve the overall seismic response of BRBFs with a reduction in the residual drift response.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1285
页数:12
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Al-Hamaydeh M.(2016)Key parameters influencing performance and failure modes for BRBs J. Constr. Steel Res. 116 1-18
[2]  
Abed F.(2004)Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 130 880-894
[3]  
Mustapha A.(2012)Seismic behavior of steel buildings with hybrid braced frames ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 139 1019-1032
[4]  
Black C. J.(2001)Application of low yield strength steel on controlled plastification ductile concentrically braced frames Can. J. Civil Eng. 28 823-836
[5]  
Makris N.(2016)Effect of the un-bonding materials on the mechanic behavior of all-steel buckling restrained braces Eng. Struct. 111 478-493
[6]  
Aiken I. D.(2012)Steel buckling-restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 1137-1156
[7]  
Chao S. H.(2008)Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structure: Development and validation J. Struct. Eng. 134 96-107
[8]  
Karki N. B.(2011)Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05 J. Struct. Eng. 137 589-599
[9]  
Sahoo D. R.(2010)An experimental study on steel-encased buckling-restrained brace hysteretic dampers Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39 561-581
[10]  
Chen C. C.(2007)Seismic response and performance of buckling-restrained braced frames ASCE J. Struct. Eng. 133 1195-1204