Quantum chemical predictions of water–octanol partition coefficients applied to the SAMPL6 logP blind challenge

被引:0
作者
Michael R. Jones
Bernard R. Brooks
机构
[1] National Institutes of Health,Laboratory of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
来源
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design | 2020年 / 34卷
关键词
Partition coefficient; log; SAMPL; SMD; Water–octanol; DFT; Implicit solvation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Theoretical approaches for predicting physicochemical properties are valuable tools for accelerating the drug discovery process. In this work, quantum chemical methods are used to predict water–octanol partition coefficients as a part of the SAMPL6 blind challenge. The SMD continuum solvent model was employed with MP2 and eight DFT functionals in conjunction with correlation consistent basis sets to determine the water–octanol transfer free energy. Several tactics towards improving the predictions of the partition coefficient were examined, including increasing the quality of basis sets, considering tautomerization, and accounting for inhomogeneities in the water and n-octanol phases. Evaluation of these various schemes highlights the impact of modeling approaches across different methods. With the inclusion of tautomers and adjustments to the permittivity constants, the best predictions were obtained with smaller basis sets and the O3LYP functional, which yielded an RMSE of 0.79 logP units. The results presented correspond to the SAMPL6 logP submission IDs: DYXBT, O7DJK, and AHMTF.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 493
页数:8
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Muhammad U(2018)Review on: quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) modeling J Anal Pharm Res 7 240-242
[2]  
Uzairu A(2015)Quantitative structure–activity relationship: promising advances in drug discovery platforms Expert Opin Drug Discov 10 1283-1300
[3]  
Ebuka Arthur D(2019)4D-quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling: making a comeback Expert Opin Drug Discov 14 1227-1235
[4]  
Wang T(2013)Advances in the molecular modeling and quantitative structure–activity relationship-based design for antihistamines Expert Opin Drug Discov 8 305-317
[5]  
Wu M-B(2006)Modeling robust QSAR J Chem Inf Model 46 2310-2318
[6]  
Lin J-P(2018)QSAR-based virtual screening: advances and applications in drug discovery Front Pharmacol 9 1275-2639
[7]  
Yang L-R(2017)Interpretation of quantitative structure-activity relationship models: past, present, and future J Chem Inf Model 57 2618-150
[8]  
Fourches D(2018)Best practices for QSAR model reporting: physical and chemical properties, ecotoxicity, environmental fate, human health, and toxicokinetics endpoints Environ Health Perspect 126 126001-474
[9]  
Ash J(2014)Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge J Comput Aided Mol Des 28 135-279
[10]  
Galvez J(2012)SAMPL3: blinded prediction of host–guest binding affinities, hydration free energies, and trypsin inhibitors J Comput Aided Mol Des 26 473-496