Free decay and excitation of the chandler wobble: self-consistent estimates of the period and quality factor

被引:0
作者
Wei Chen
Yifei Chen
Jim Ray
Jiesi Luo
Jian Cheng Li
机构
[1] Wuhan University,Hubei Luojia Laboratory, School of Geodesy and Geomatics
[2] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,undefined
[3] Central South University,undefined
来源
Journal of Geodesy | 2023年 / 97卷
关键词
Earth rotation; Chandler wobble; Quality factor; Love number; Transfer function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The period TCW and quality factor QCW of the Chandler wobble (CW) as well as polar motion (PM) transfer functions are all determined by the Earth’s layered structure, mass distribution, elasticity, rheology and energy dissipation, via the Earth’s dynamic figure parameters and complex degree-2 Love numbers. However, most previous studies used geophysical excitations derived from real-valued PM transfer functions to invert for TCW and QCW, thus leading to results that are not self-consistent. By separating the observed PM into the freely decaying CW and the excited PM, a traverse-based method is proposed to search values of TCW and QCW that can fit both sides simultaneously, yielding the self-consistent estimates of TCW = 430.4 mean solar days and QCW = 130. This implies the degree-2 tidal Love number k = 0.35011 − 0.00226i and load Love number k' =  − 0.36090 + 0.00233i, and the PM transfer functions TNL = 1.80001 − 0.00692i (non-loading) and TL = 1.15040 − 0.00023i (loading) valid at the Chandler period.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Altamimi Z(2016)ITRF2014: a new release of the international terrestrial reference frame modeling nonlinear station motions J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121 6109-6131
[2]  
Rebischung P(2019)The IERS EOP 14C04 solution for Earth orientation parameters consistent with ITRF 2014 J Geod 93 621-633
[3]  
Métivier L(2002)Oceanic excitation of the Chandler wobble Adv Space Res 30 195-200
[4]  
Collilieux X(2013)Polar motion excitations for an Earth model with frequency-dependent responses: 1. A refined theory with insight into the earth’s rheology and core-mantle coupling J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118 4975-4994
[5]  
Bizouard C(2013)Polar motion excitations for an Earth model with frequency-dependent responses: 2. Numerical tests of the meteorological excitations J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118 4995-5007
[6]  
Lambert S(2015)Consistent estimates of the dynamical figure parameters of the Earth J Geod 89 179-188
[7]  
Gattano C(2017)Improved geophysical excitations constrained by polar motion observations and GRACE/SLR time-dependent gravity Geodesy Geodyn 8 377-388
[8]  
Becker O(2019)Multiple-data-based monthly geopotential model set LDCmgm90 Sci Data 6 228-356
[9]  
Richard JY(2003)Evaluation of “effective angular momentum function” formulations with respect to core-mantle coupling J Geophys Res 108 2150-702
[10]  
Brzezinski A(1981)Preliminary reference Earth model Phys Earth Planet Inter 25 297-390