Remote proctoring for high-risk coronary interventions with mechanical circulatory support during COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

被引：0
作者：
Felix J. Woitek
Stephan Haussig
Johannes Mierke
Axel Linke
Norman Mangner
机构：
[1] Technische Universität Dresden,Herzzentrum Dresden, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology
来源：
Clinical Research in Cardiology | 2021年 / 110卷
关键词：
Mechanical circulatory support; Impella; Remote proctoring; High-risk PCI;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Remote proctoring by advanced digital technologies may help to overcome pandemic, geographic, and resource-related constraints for mentoring and educating interventional cardiology skills. We present a case series of patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) guided by remote proctoring to gain insights into a streaming technology platform with regard to video/audio quality, visibility of all structural and imaging details, and delay in transmission. According to our experience, remote proctoring appears to be a reliable, quick, and resource-conserving way to disseminate, educate and improve MCS-supported HR-PCI with implications far beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码：1525 / 1530
页数：5
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Hui DS(2020)The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health—the latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan China Int J Infect Dis 91 264-266
[2]  
Azhar I(2021)Hospitalization deficit of in- and outpatient cases with cardiovascular diseases and utilization of cardiological interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the German-wide helios hospital network Clin Cardiol 44 392-400
[3]  
Madani TA(2021)Performing elective cardiac invasive procedures during the COVID-19 outbreak: a position statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) EuroIntervention 16 1177-1186
[4]  
Ntoumi F(2016)A practical approach to mechanical circulatory support in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an interventional perspective JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9 871-883
[5]  
Kock R(2020)The evolving landscape of Impella use in the United States among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with mechanical circulatory support Circulation 141 273-284
[6]  
Dar O(2014)Evaluating the learning curve in the prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subanalysis of the PROTECT II study Am Heart J 167 472-479
[7]  
Ippolito G(2019)Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: a narrative review Am J Surg 218 760-766
[8]  
Mchugh TD(2020)Role of teleproctoring in challenging and innovative structural interventions amid the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond JACC Cardiovasc Interv 13 1945-1948
[9]  
Memish ZA(2021)Training and supervision of thrombectomy by remote live streaming support (RESS): Randomized comparison using simulated stroke interventions Clin Neuroradiol 31 181-187
[10]  
Drosten C(2021)Republished: Interhospital teleproctoring of endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment using a dedicated live-streaming technology: first experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic J Neurointerv Surg 13 1-undefined
12345678910