Agreement between stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis during fluid loads in severe aortic stenosis

被引:0
作者
Lars Øivind Høiseth
Ingrid Elise Hoff
Ove Andreas Hagen
Svein Aslak Landsverk
Knut Arvid Kirkebøen
机构
[1] University of Oslo,Faculty of Medicine
[2] Oslo University Hospital,Department of Anesthesiology
[3] Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation,undefined
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2015年 / 29卷
关键词
Stroke volume; Aortic valve stenosis; Diagnostic techniques; Cardiovascular;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this analysis was to study agreement and trending of stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler and 3rd generation Vigileo during fluid loads in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Observational study in 32 patients (30 analyzed) scheduled for aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis. After induction of anesthesia and before start of surgery, hemodynamic registrations for 1 min were obtained before and after a fluid load. Agreement between stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler (SVOD) and Vigileo (SVVig) was evaluated in Bland–Altman plot and trending in four-quadrant and polar plots. Bias ± limits of agreement (LOA) between SVOD and SVVig was 24 ± 37 ml (percentage error 45 %). Concordance of the two methods from before to after a fluid load was 100 %. Angular bias ± LOA was 12° ± 28°. Absolute values of SVOD and SVVig agreed poorly, but changes were highly concordant during fluid loads in aortic stenosis patients. The angular agreement indicated acceptable trending. The two measurement methods are not interchangeable in patients with aortic stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 441
页数:6
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Stergiopulos N(1992)Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses J Biomech 25 1477-1488
[2]  
Young DF(2007)Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 21 636-643
[3]  
Rogge TR(2008)Cardiac output determination by thermodilution and arterial pulse waveform analysis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement Can J Anaesth 55 22-28
[4]  
Lorsomradee S(2013)Stroke volume determination using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis in severe aortic valve disease Intensive Care Med 39 601-611
[5]  
Lorsomradee S(2005)Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave Expert Rev Med Devices 2 523-527
[6]  
Cromheecke S(2011)Pulse contour analysis: is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient? Crit Care 15 106-757
[7]  
De Hert SG(2011)The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo–FloTrac and esophageal doppler cardiac output measurements Anesth Analg 113 751-622
[8]  
Staier K(2012)Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients Br J Anaesth 108 615-834
[9]  
Wiesenack C(2013)Impact of arterial load on the agreement between pulse pressure analysis and esophageal Doppler Crit Care 17 R113-582
[10]  
Gunkel L(2014)Dynamic variables and fluid responsiveness in patients for aortic stenosis surgery Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 58 826-546