Sensitivity analysis of FAO 33 crop water production function

被引：0
作者：
Kami Kaboosi
Feridon Kaveh
机构：
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Water Science and Engineering
[2] Science and Research Branch,undefined
来源：
Irrigation Science | 2012年 / 30卷
关键词：
Error Percentage; Relative Yield; Positive Error; Deficit Irrigation; Additive Form;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This paper presents the results of sensitivity analysis of FAO 33 method and its modified forms that were developed by Rao et al. (Agric Water Manage 13:25–32, 1988). Results show that positive error of PET and Ky and negative error of AET result in over predicting of relative yield (Yr). Sensitivity of Doorenbos and Kassam (FAO irrigation and drainage paper No. 33. FAO, Rome, Italy, 193 pp, 1979) equation (FAO 33 method) and additive form of Rao et al. (Agric Water Manage 13:25–32, 1988) equation is equal for positive or negative error of Ky and AET, but their sensitivities are greater for negative error of PET than positive error. However, sensitivity of multiplicative form of Rao et al. (Agric Water Manage 13:25–32, 1988) equation is greater for negative error of Ky and PET and positive error of AET. Error percentage on estimation of Yr by multiplicative form of Rao et al. (Agric Water Manage 13:25–32, 1988) equation arising from error of PET, AET, or Ky is less than additive form. In addition, calculated Yr by multiplicative equation is higher than additive form and the difference between two forms of this equation increases severely when water shortage increases. According to the results, it is recommended that multiplicative form of Rao et al. (Agric Water Manage 13:25–32, 1988) equation instead of additive form be used in optimization models and deficit irrigation planning.
引用
收藏
页码：89 / 100
页数：11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Dehghanisanij H(2009)Assessment of wheat and maize water productivities and production function for cropping system decisions in arid and semiarid regions Irrig Drain 58 105-115
[2]  
Nakhjavani MM(2004)Linear and non-linear optimization models for allocation of a limited water supply Irrig Drain 53 39-54
[3]  
Tahiri AZ(2007)Evaluation of selected crop water production functions for an irrigated maize crop Agric Water Manage 94 1-10
[4]  
Anyoji H(2002)Seasonal water production functions and yield response factors for maize and onion in Perkerra, Kenya Agric Water Manage 56 229-240
[5]  
Ghahraman B(2002)MIOS: a decision tool for determination of optimal irrigated cropping pattern of multicrop system under water scarcity constraints Irrig Drain 51 155-166
[6]  
Sepaskhah AR(1994)Optimization analysis of deficit irrigation systems J Irrig Drain Eng 120 484-503
[7]  
Igbadun HE(2008)Optimal water productivity of irrigation networks in arid and semi- arid regions Irrig Drain 57 411-423
[8]  
Tarimo AKPR(1988)A simple dated water-production function for use in irrigated agriculture Agric Water Manage 13 25-32
[9]  
Salim BA(2001)Optimization model for water allocation in deficit irrigation system, I: description of the model Agric Water Manage 48 103-116
[10]  
Mahoo HF(2001)Optimization model for water allocation in deficit irrigation systems, II: application to the Bembezar irrigation system Agric Water Manage 48 117-132
1234