Modifying agricultural water management to adapt to climate change in California’s central valley

被引:0
作者
Brian A. Joyce
Vishal K. Mehta
David R. Purkey
Larry L. Dale
Michael Hanemann
机构
[1] Stockholm Environment Institute,Economics Department
[2] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,undefined
[3] Arizona State University,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2011年 / 109卷
关键词
Water Demand; Emission Scenario; Future Climate Scenario; Crop Water Requirement; Irrigation Efficiency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Climate change impacts and potential adaptation strategies were assessed using an application of the Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) system developed for the Sacramento River basin and Delta export region of the San Joaquin Valley. WEAP is an integrated rainfall/runoff, water resources systems modeling framework that can be forced directly from time series of climatic input to estimate water supplies (watershed runoff) and demands (crop evapotranspiration). We applied the model to evaluate the hydrologic implications of 12 climate change scenarios as well as the water management ramifications of the implied hydrologic changes. In addition to evaluating the impacts of climate change with current operations, the model also assessed the impacts of changing agricultural management strategies in response to a changing climate. These adaptation strategies included improvements in irrigation technology and shifts in cropping patterns towards higher valued crops. Model simulations suggested that increasing agricultural demand under climate change brought on by increasing temperature will place additional stress on the water system, such that some water users will experience a decrease in water supply reliability. The study indicated that adaptation strategies may ease the burden on the water management system. However, offsetting water demands through these approaches will not be enough to fully combat the impacts of climate change on water management. To adequately address the impacts of climate change, adaptation strategies will have to include fundamental changes in the ways in which the water management system is operated.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 316
页数:17
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Maurer E(2002)A long-term hydrologically-based data set of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States J. Climate 15 3237-3251
[2]  
Wood A(2008)Robust analysis of future climate change impacts on water for agriculture and other sectors: A case study in the Sacramento Valley Climatic Change 87 S109-S122
[3]  
Adam J(2005)WEAP21: A demand, priority, and preference driven water planning model: Part 1, model characteristics Water International 30 487-500
[4]  
Lettenmaier D(2005)WEAP21: A demand, priority, and preference driven water planning model: Part 2, Aiding freshwater ecosystem service evaluation Water International 30 501-512
[5]  
Nijsee B(2009)A climate-driven water resources model of the Sacramento Basin, California USA using WEAP21 ASCE J Wat Res. Management 135 303-313
[6]  
Purkey DR(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[7]  
Joyce BA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Vicuna S(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Hanemann MW(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Dale LL(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined