Sharpening the tools of imagination

被引:0
作者
Michael T. Stuart
机构
[1] National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University,Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition
[2] London School of Economics,Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science
来源
Synthese | / 200卷
关键词
Epistemic tools; Thought experiment; Visualization; Models; Computer simulations; Metaphor; Metaepistemology; Epistemology of science; Epistemological consequentialism; Deontic epistemology; Virtue epistemology; Scientific imagination;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Thought experiments, models, diagrams, computer simulations, and metaphors can all be understood as tools of the imagination. While these devices are usually treated separately in philosophy of science, this paper provides a unified account according to which tools of the imagination are epistemically good insofar as they improve scientific imaginings. Improving scientific imagining is characterized in terms of epistemological consequences: more improvement means better consequences. A distinction is then drawn between tools being good in retrospect, at the time, and in general. In retrospect, tools are evaluated straightforwardly in terms of the quality of their consequences. At the cutting edge, tools are evaluated positively insofar as there is reason to believe that using them will have good consequences. Lastly, tools can be generally good, insofar as their use encourages the development of epistemic virtues, which are good because they have good epistemic consequences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [1] Alexandrova A(2008)Making models count Philosophy of Science 75 383-404
  • [2] Arcangeli M(2018)The hidden links between real, thought and numerical experiments Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18 3-22
  • [3] Arsiwalla XD(2019)Beyond neural coding? Lessons from perceptual control theory Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 171-204
  • [4] Bote RM(2018)Are computer simulations experiments? And if not, how are they related to each other? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 24 195-205
  • [5] Verschure P(1995)Computer games: Increase learning in an interactive multidisciplinary environment Journal of Educational Technology Systems 174 47-64
  • [6] Beisbart C(2019)Neural coding: The bureaucratic model of the brain Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 309-329
  • [7] Betz JA(2017)Why metaphors make good insults: Perspectives, presupposition, and pragmatics Philosophical Studies 20 183-206
  • [8] Brette R(2019)Modest and immodest neural codes: Can there be modest codes? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 377-396
  • [9] Camp E(2013)The epistemology of thought experiments: A non-eliminativist, non-platonic account European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 61-74
  • [10] Cao R(2012)Idols of the Imagination: Francis Bacon on the Imagination and the Medicine of the Mind Perspectives on Science 80 1084-3474