Integration of Basic and Clinical Sciences: Student Perceptions

被引:0
作者
Dharini van der Hoeven
Liang Zhu
Kamal Busaidy
Ryan L. Quock
J. Nathaniel Holland
Ransome van der Hoeven
机构
[1] The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston - School of Dentistry,Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences
[2] The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston – McGovern Medical School,Biostatistics & Epidemiology Research Design Core, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, and Department of Internal Medicine
[3] The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston - School of Dentistry,Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery
[4] The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston - School of Dentistry,Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics
[5] The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston - School of Dentistry,Office of Research
来源
Medical Science Educator | 2020年 / 30卷
关键词
Integrated; Curriculum; UTSD; Dental; Educators;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The integrated curriculum is becoming a popular concept among dental schools. The purpose of this study was to query dental students at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston – School of Dentistry (UTSD) to elucidate their level of interest in the integrated curriculum, perception of how much integration is currently occurring, and identify challenges to integration. To address this question, dental students at UTSD were invited to participate in a survey. Participants reported their perspectives on integration of sciences. All survey participants agreed that it is beneficial to integrate clinical and basic sciences and that basic science educators were incorporating clinical relevance in their regular teaching. The third and fourth year classes, classes that had been exposed to general as well as all specialty dentistry clinics, agreed that basic sciences are being incorporated into most clinical teaching. Top two barriers to integration identified by the students were lack of crossover knowledge of faculty, and insufficient time to explore connections between basic sciences and clinical sciences because of the volume of information that needs to be covered. In conclusion, student perception at UTSD is that overall basic and clinical sciences are being integrated throughout the curriculum.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 252
页数:9
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Asimalis GK(2011)Evolution of student assessment following implementation of an integrated medical curriculum: contribution to improved educational outcomes Med Sci Educ 21 181-189
[2]  
Ainsworth MA(2015)The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96 Med Teach 37 312-322
[3]  
Aronson JF(2006)Health science faculty members’ perceptions of curricular integration: insights and obstacles J Int Assoc Med Sci Educ 6 31-34
[4]  
Frye AW(2006)American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report N Engl J Med 355 1339-1344
[5]  
Lieberman SA(1997)Problem-based medical education: development of a theoretical foundation and a science-based professional attitude Med Educ 31 416-424
[6]  
Rabel JP(2002)Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: examples and experiences from Linkoping, Sweden Med Teach 24 280-285
[7]  
Brauer DG(2011)The Flexner report ― 100 years later Yale J Biol Med 84 269-276
[8]  
Ferguson KJ(2007)Using high-fidelity emergency simulation with large groups of preclinical medical students in a basic science course Med Teach 29 261-263
[9]  
Brueckner JK(2006)Can a simulated critical care encounter accelerate basic science learning among preclinical medical students? A pilot study Simul Healthc 1 13-17
[10]  
Gould DJ(2000)The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation Med Educ 34 551-557