Noninvasive brain stimulation to lateral prefrontal cortex alters the novelty of creative idea generation

被引:0
作者
Yoed N. Kenett
David S. Rosen
Emilio R. Tamez
Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
机构
[1] University of Pennsylvania,Department of Psychology
[2] Technion – Israel Institute of Technology,Department of Psychology
[3] Faculty of industrial Engineering & Management,undefined
[4] Drexel University,undefined
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2021年 / 21卷
关键词
tDCS; Cognitive control; Creativity; LSA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Theories of the processes involved in creative cognition posit that cognitive control has a negative effect on creative idea generation but a positive effect on creative idea evaluation. Brain stimulation research has started to examine empirically the effects of cognitive control, with several reports of decreased cognitive control facilitating creative ideation. Such studies have shown how decreased cognitive control mechanisms facilitate creative idea generation, potentially by allowing participants access to less inhibited weaker-related associations, thereby increasing novelty. In the current study, we advance this line of work by investigating how cognitive control affects creative thinking, potentially inhibiting or facilitating novel idea generation based on task demands. Participants read sentences with the final word missing and were instructed to complete the sentence with an uncommon (but appropriate) ending. Participants performed this task while undergoing either anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), or sham (control) transcranial direct current stimulation over their left prefrontal cortex. These responses were then rated for their novelty and appropriateness by an independent sample of raters. We found that anodal stimulation increased the appropriateness and decreased the novelty of participants’ responses. Contrary to previous studies, we did not find that cathodal stimulation increased the novelty of participants’ responses, which may be due to the nature of our task. Overall, we demonstrate how cognitive control mechanisms may inhibit novel idea generation.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 326
页数:15
相关论文
共 290 条
[1]  
Acar S(2014)Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking Creativity Research Journal 26 229-238
[2]  
Runco MA(2019)Divergent thinking: New methods, recent research, and extended theory Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 13 153-158
[3]  
Acar S(2020)What should people be told when they take a divergent thinking test? A meta-analytic review of explicit instructions for divergent thinking Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 14 39-49
[4]  
Runco MA(2008)Fronto-temporal interactions during overt verbal initiation and suppression Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 1656-1669
[5]  
Acar S(2012)Why do ideas get more creative over time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts 6 309-319
[6]  
Runco MA(2014)The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition Memory & Cognition 42 1-12
[7]  
Park H(1962)An application of factor analysis in neuropsychology The Psychological Record 12 147-156
[8]  
Allen P(2016)Scoring divergent thinking tests by computer with a semantics-based algorithm Europe's Journal of Psychology 12 210-220
[9]  
Mechelli A(2019)Toward a neurocognitive framework of creative cognition: the role of memory, attention, and cognitive control Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 27 I116-122
[10]  
Stephan KE(2012)Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity Personality and Individual Differences 53 480-485