Physiological Characters Imparting Resistance to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Sugarcane

被引:4
作者
A. K. Shrivastava
D. C. Srivastava
S. Solomon
M. K. Srivastava
Ishwar Singh
机构
[1] Indian Inst. of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow - 226 002, Uttar Pradesh
关键词
Abiotic stress; Biotic stress; Physiological characters; Resistance/tolerance;
D O I
10.1007/BF02943620
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sugarcane genotypes have been known to possess differential resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses which adversely affect sugarcane and sugar productivity per se. This review is an effort to elucidate physiological characteristics imparting resistance/ tolerance to biotic stresses viz. insect-pests and diseases and abiotic stresses, viz. drought, waterlogging, etc. Certain physiological attributes like tight leaf sheaths imparted multiple resistance, i.e., against internode borer, pyrilla and lygaeid bugs; aged canes imparted resistance to mealy bugs, eye spot and rust diseases and waterlogged conditions. Similarly, polyphenol oxidase activity related to resistance against red rot and waterlogged conditions. Resistance to certain stresses is also confounded with a number of other morphological or physiological characteristics. These characteristics could be considered as physiological basis for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and also used as marker for marker-assisted selection in directed breeding programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 120
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deciphering the mechanism of E3 ubiquitin ligases in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses and perspectives on PROTACs for crop resistance
    Su, Yingying
    Ngea, Guillaume Legrand Ngolong
    Wang, Kaili
    Lu, Yuchun
    Godana, Esa Abiso
    Ackah, Michael
    Yang, Qiya
    Zhang, Hongyin
    [J]. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 22 (10) : 2811 - 2843
  • [42] Potassium in plant physiological adaptation to abiotic stresses
    Mostofa, Mohammad Golam
    Rahman, Md. Mezanur
    Ghosh, Totan Kumar
    Kabir, Ahmad Humayan
    Abdelrahman, Mostafa
    Khan, Md. Arifur Rahman
    Mochida, Keiichi
    Tran, Lam -Son Phan
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 186 : 279 - 289
  • [43] Diverse roles of tocopherols in response to abiotic and biotic stresses and strategies for genetic biofortification in plants
    Jiangtao Ma
    Deyun Qiu
    Yongzhen Pang
    Hongwen Gao
    Xuemin Wang
    Yuchang Qin
    [J]. Molecular Breeding, 2020, 40
  • [44] Biotic and Abiotic Stresses Activate Different Ca2+ Permeable Channels in Arabidopsis
    Cao, Xiao-Qiang
    Jiang, Zhong-Hao
    Yi, Yan-Yan
    Yang, Yi
    Ke, Li-Ping
    Pei, Zhen-Ming
    Zhu, Shan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 8
  • [45] Diverse roles of tocopherols in response to abiotic and biotic stresses and strategies for genetic biofortification in plants
    Ma, Jiangtao
    Qiu, Deyun
    Pang, Yongzhen
    Gao, Hongwen
    Wang, Xuemin
    Qin, Yuchang
    [J]. MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2020, 40 (02)
  • [46] Identification and expression of the WRKY transcription factors of Carica papaya in response to abiotic and biotic stresses
    Lin-jie Pan
    Ling Jiang
    [J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2014, 41 : 1215 - 1225
  • [47] Seed Priming: Molecular and Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance
    Jatana, Bhupinder Singh
    Grover, Sajjan
    Ram, Hari
    Baath, Gurjinder Singh
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [48] Comprehensive identification of the VQ family genes in cucumber and their roles in response to abiotic and biotic stresses
    Lai, Wei
    Zhu, Chuxia
    Yang, Shuting
    Hu, Zhaoyang
    Liu, Shiqiang
    Zhou, Yong
    [J]. SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2022, 295
  • [49] Say ?NO? to plant stresses: Unravelling the role of nitric oxide under abiotic and biotic stress
    Kumar, Deepak
    Ohri, Puja
    [J]. NITRIC OXIDE-BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2023, 130 : 36 - 57
  • [50] Identification and expression of the WRKY transcription factors of Carica papaya in response to abiotic and biotic stresses
    Pan, Lin-jie
    Jiang, Ling
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 41 (03) : 1215 - 1225